Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mousebounce
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JOEYKID
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mousebounce
Quote:
|
Lately there's been few incidents that have seriously damaged this principle, namely the "banning" of Joeykid. Okay, he wasn't banned on other forums than FS, but his ability to send PMs was removed. Not too free in my book.
|
There are rules, and there is no point in having them if there are no consequences. |
That implies I broke rules.
Please name them as as far as i am concernd and others, no rules were broken. |
I could sit here and tell you again, but I won't. The discussion will end up in a fight of about 10 pages, which in the end will solve nothing. I am going to save us the trouble.  If you really are unaware of what happened, I suggest you PM Peter. |
I can't PM Peter when PMs are disabled, tell me your not another who replies to posts without reading them.
Also. I'm asking YOU Brooke. You make the comment, you back it up. Something many at JT struggle with 99.9% of the time.
Once again, no rules were broken. Yes, i personally attacked Kathleen but that was after i was banned from FS.
If you get your facts right you will find the reason I was banned was to make way for discussion without arguments. I caused too much shit for anything to get done. I was banned to make space for discussion and forward movement in the forum. Now - where were any rules broken? Exactly. Thank you.
Added to that the fact STILL nothing got done so im laughing abit there but back to my point.
No doubt about it I broke rules by personally attacking Kathleen, but that was
A F T E R I was banned. The punishment for that was disabling the PM system. [agreed with Neil, pretty pointless, but nevermind]
So Brooke, please get your facts right yeah? I'm not arguing with you, I'm correcting you.
If no-one around here can back shit up its wise to keep thier mouth shut. I guess a general rule but people still talk crap with no backing.