How stupid was it to lock the previous thread?

Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. Was there a reason for Joey to join it?? Didn't think so. But again, freedom of speech is a wonderful thing, so we should all partake in it.

Yes, I have a large ego because I am one of the moderators of a Bon Jovi messageboard. I brag to all of my friends each and every day about my accomplishments as moderator. It makes for interesting dinner conversation too!!!

Yes stoopid, I was part of the original thread.

Stoopid or stupid.

Brooke can you not hack discussion this evening?

Though Peter locked the topic at least he has a grip on the situation....

har har.

Cya.

Somebody give me a bucket!

Are you trying to imitate Seb? This line would fit him perfectly well.

Seeing how long the search function is already gone I am also of the opinion that your final decision had been made long ago as well.
I find it rather odd though that, if it is true, you did not answer a few questions that you were asked in order to understand your decisions. It's not that you have to account for anything, you don't, but, like Ice, I don't understand why you do not respond to suggestions of people who are willing and able to help.

You mean you already harassed people in the other thread?

I'm just using his own words to make a point, yes.

There was a discussion regarding the search function when it was removed. I explained my reasons, Iceman disagrees with them and that is it. He will say he is right, I will say I am. He thinks highly of himself when it comes to web programming & this tech stuff but so do I. There are also personal reasons which I won't discuss here. Let's just say it would be possible to re-enable the search function, keep the FAG forum and have a stable server, I know how to do it but it requires quite a lot of work, system updates and possible server downtime. And at the moment I simply don't have the time to go through all that. And letting someone else mess with the server is not an option.

I already expected something like this. I'm fine with this and the rest of what you said. Thanks for answering.

Aloha !

You're confusing 2 things. What you're doing is expressing your opinion about something I replied on and you then try to make it look like that what I had said was wrong. I often present facts while you often miss the entire point and just try to make a fool of me for the sake of it. You do those things to several other people and it makes your personal crusade against everybody you disagree with rather silly instead of "smart".

Says the person who always thinks he's more right than me...If it fits me it would fit you as well.

Thank you. This is something we all hadn't realised before.

Yes you explained your reasons, Ice brought in his thoughts and the only people who really gave it a thought were the people that actually read what Ice said instead of defending the FAG forum or agreeing with you because you were the admin.

I am just wondering why you didn't answer Iceman's questions and explanations but kept on repeating your story about this being your messageboard and if me and Ice know better we should create our own forum. Why is it that you think Iceman is wrong regarding this issue ? I'm sure you can explain it.

Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan

Well, if one were to judge by the number of times this topic has been brought up it would seem you hadn't AT ALL

I don't think he thinks I'm wrong. But being too diplomatic is sometimes a problem.

Ice