Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stranger
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jag
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stranger
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jag
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stranger
1. Jag is a nut!
2. 7800°
|
all illustrators are :P |
That's real good 
First I was just joking, I didn't really want to attack you personally.
But to get back to the serious point. I'm really tired of this "To say something negative about "Bon Jovi" and "7800" = say something positive about Bj because you deny their hard rock roots" |
dont get me wrong i think they are good albums on a guitar level, lots of great rock licks and solos. and i do like to hear the youth running wild there sometimes but i find it very very raw...i just prefer all the other albums is, perhaps i can relate better to them i guess and i think muscially they are better put together. also i found the first album rather typcial cliched rock music in that time u know?
just my view is all... |
About 7800 I see it that way: no producer got the chance to cut all the edges off, thats mainly what I like about it, it's just rough. Quite strange the reason why you don't like it much is the reason why it's my fave BJ record. IMO they never were as hard and as true agian like on 7800.
About the self-titeld record I don't want to answer since I don't know what does "cliched" actually mean? Would you explain? |
i just found the 1st album quite typical of a pop/rock act, the themes, the guitars...everything really was done b4 and was being done at that time...at least 7800 had abit of edge...raw or not it had more personality for me then 'bon jovi'.