Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
I thought it'd be perfectly clear that in the way I meant it getting serious would mean saying negative things about Bon Jovi. Ofcourse I know that generally it isn't true, otherwise my postive reviews would be one big joke, which they obviously aren't.
|
Exactly, I was just doing what you do. Taking something someone said and "analyze" it only to call him/her the biggest asshole on the planet or something to that extent.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
You're the one who just keeps trying to put me down in any way by saying I am wrong and whatever and putting things out of the context just to get your right.
|
Because that is what YOU do most of your time on here, or with your "projects". I am no representative of a higher law, nor have I been appointed by anyone to hunt you down. I just believe that your behaviour is downright unfair most of the time and I will continue to say so when I see the need. And I will continue to do it without calling you names.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Sometimes you're lucky and I simply give up due to you not being worth my time, sometimes I'm bored and I keep going against you, which only makes you more look like the obsessed Supersonic stalker.
|
Neither does the time I waste with you pay me any bills, but I find it simply unbelievable that your rudeness made most of the people you insulted shut up. You should be told back what you tell others.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Your past er, 100 replies aimed at me often have nothing to do with being harmless or anything. They're just attempts to put me down. It sometimes looks like you want to be the one who is able to make Supersonic hush. If it'd be because of the discussions I'd create and because of the things I say, I don't have a problem with it. Yet, you try to discuss the way I talk instead of the things I talk about.
|
But that's the point. The way you talk about others is condescending and offending and makes most people shut themselves off to what you are actually talking about. I am often speechless what obviously sane people on here over-look of your comments because of your questionable reputation. Therefore I go against.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
My laughing at other people most of time is about the things I say. Not about the way people say things.
|
I suppose that reads "...about the things they say." Fine. And my replies to you are about the way you say things. Period. And it is not because I have fun putting you down or nothing better to do. It is because it is plain simply impertinent how you treat others for not sharing your opinion.
It is NOT a serious discussion when you call others dick, moron, sucker or mother****er or just tell them that they make no sense - at all - with such a slam that it equally refers to their existence on this planet. And all that because they don't share your view on things or don't take your arguments for the truth or are not as smart as, let's say, Iceman. If anything it makes them not see your often valid arguments.
I don't know if you need to do that for your self-esteem or if you just have fun putting others down. Either way, I find it sad and worth to say something against.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Yet you never actually get into the discussion to prove me that my sole truth is wrong. If you'd do that, all your posts aimed at me would actually make sense. Now you only sort of complain about me being wrong, but can't tell me what I'm wrong about. No examples, only complaints.
|
I tell you all the time what it is I am talking about. You refuse to get it or you are incapable of dealing with what you do to others. I am happy to repeat it again: It IS about how you say things, NOT what things you say. I don't need to prove your truths anything - because often I agree with them. I think it is pathetic that you need to put your thoughts across as if they were engraved in stone, dismissing everyone who does not acknowledge, or better praise, your points as if only you are supposed to understand the world.
It is so laughable when you try to include all eventualities for disagreeing replies into your initial posts or emissions a la
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Before you show up with your arguments like "ooh he's so sad to put so much effort in a page like this blahblahblah",
|
that what you actually have to say disappears. You are able to put down people before they even reply. And if someone dares to reply something you didn't see coming - or something you expected to be said (by me for example), you start a rant at him/her what this or that has got to do with the "discussion". Nothing - or just as much as your insults have.