Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

Bon Jovi, hard to classify

General BJ Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-22-2004, 06:20 AM
Twister's Avatar
Twister Twister is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 05 Apr 2003
Location: Mexico, DF
Posts: 386
Send a message via MSN to Twister
Default Bon Jovi, hard to classify

I found this note on "CONOZCA MÁS", my fave magazine: (I'll translate it for you):

Quote:
What has happened with tha stadium rockers?

A little time ago, there were still groups that could finish 15-months (or more) tours and full-filled the stadiums at every show. Since that, this kind of rock, without mattering their musical influences, was called arena rock. It wasn't new or unusual. The Beatles, doubtless, opened the way. The main feature of these bands, I think, and the main reason of their convocation power, was the fact that their music went easily through a big mood spectrum. This means, they weren't set on an especifical style. Since Queen and Boston, through U2, Metallica, INXS....
...and Bon Jovi....

Quote:
or also Pearl Jam and Guns n' Roses, went any kind of moods on a same show or album. They played ballads, blues, protest songs or "feel-good" rock, instrumental songs, between other styles.

This is, maybe the main lesson for the new generations. Today, everythings has to be part of a movement or adjust on an specific style. The artists cannot give theirselves the freedom to create "freely", because they have the risk of lose that somethimg that identifies 'em. The day that the Strokes stop doing exclusively garage, or Blink 182, their juvenile happy-punk, or Korn, their stanked nu-metal (argh!) (sic) the fans will leave them alone because "they aren't the same than before".

I don't mean it's wrong what these groups do. Simply they forgot one of the most important features of rock: its absolute autodetermination. There are exceptions, but the argument is there. I invite you to think on 3 or more bands, born at the last 4 years, with a big convocation power, that aren't set on an specifical style, or that they can make music "hard to classify", propositive and with variety. (Flaming Lips are 90's. also Red Hot Chili Peppers, Radiohead and Placebo). On my opwn case, the answer wasn't easy.
I think it's true. Don't try to set Bo Jovi into an especifical style. Don't delete our chance for listening something different.
__________________
<h4>Lars Kriegentragen Ulrich</h4>

The weak will fall, the strong remains...
All people are heroes... in dreams
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 03-22-2004, 05:42 PM
Javier's Avatar
Javier Javier is offline
Senior Member
Blaze of Posting
 
Join Date: 22 Aug 2002
Location: Puerto Rico
Gender: male
Posts: 9,345
Default

I don't understand Where does it mention Bon Jovi there?? Or were you trying to say that Bon Jovi are a versatile band??
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2004, 02:33 AM
ugly_queen_from_mars's Avatar
ugly_queen_from_mars ugly_queen_from_mars is offline
Senior Member
It's my post
 
Join Date: 10 Jan 2003
Location: Greece
Age: 39
Gender: female
Posts: 4,897
Default

i think he means that bands should not be categorised under a certain genre because they are not free to create their music.
i agree but i also disagree. i think that bands should be free to create but that doesn't mean that if they belong to a certain genre (rock for example) and they become pop or hip hop :P just to sell i will like them.
and i don't think that this left feels right was so creative but just a rushed album to raise the sales.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.