Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

Bon Jovi History eras

General BJ Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-25-2022, 07:05 PM
Kriegentragen's Avatar
Kriegentragen Kriegentragen is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 28 Apr 2007
Location: Mexico City, DF
Gender: male
Posts: 400
Default Bon Jovi History eras

Now that we’re most likely heading to the end of the history of our beloved band, I was thinking on how could it be divided.

This is the division I thought (sorry about the names, I’m not that good naming things)

1983-1985 The formation years, where the band was still figuring out who they were and how to do it.

1986-1991 The top of the world years, when they became a smash hit. This was the era of #1s, excruciating tours and greatest success.

1992-1999 The 90s, where the band switched their style and reached its peak in terms of musicality, composition and lyrically wise.

2000-2006 The turn of the millenium, where they came back with yet another new style, and had their last smash hits (It’s my life -worldwide- and Who says -in US-)

2007-2013 The “machine” years, where John Shanks took greater creative control, and the music and lyrics took a more “adult” turn. On the plus side, this was the time of Jon’s vocal and performance Indian summer.

2014- The post-Richie years, marked by Jon’s vocal decline, longer hiatuses, and Shanks still on command. Anyway, out of his comfort zone, Jon was moved to do better compositions.

What do you think? Is there some change you would make to this division, or maybe have more or less eras?
__________________
New Jersey / These Days / Keep The Faith / Slippery when Wet / Have a Nice Day / Aftermath of the Lowdown / Crush / Bounce / 7800 Degrees Fahrenheit / What About Now / Undiscovered Soul / The Circle / Lost Highway / Young Guns / Stranger in This Town / Destination Anywhere / Bon Jovi

Last edited by Kriegentragen; 09-25-2022 at 07:10 PM..
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 10-08-2022, 08:43 PM
efpg0708 efpg0708 is offline
Senior Member
Dry County
 
Join Date: 27 Jul 2010
Location: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Age: 38
Gender: male
Posts: 1,553
Default Bon Jovi History eras

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriegentragen View Post
Now that we’re most likely heading to the end of the history of our beloved band, I was thinking on how could it be divided.

This is the division I thought (sorry about the names, I’m not that good naming things)

1983-1985 The formation years, where the band was still figuring out who they were and how to do it.

1986-1991 The top of the world years, when they became a smash hit. This was the era of #1s, excruciating tours and greatest success.

1992-1999 The 90s, where the band switched their style and reached its peak in terms of musicality, composition and lyrically wise.

2000-2006 The turn of the millenium, where they came back with yet another new style, and had their last smash hits (It’s my life -worldwide- and Who says -in US-)

2007-2013 The “machine” years, where John Shanks took greater creative control, and the music and lyrics took a more “adult” turn. On the plus side, this was the time of Jon’s vocal and performance Indian summer.

2014- The post-Richie years, marked by Jon’s vocal decline, longer hiatuses, and Shanks still on command. Anyway, out of his comfort zone, Jon was moved to do better compositions.

What do you think? Is there some change you would make to this division, or maybe have more or less eras?

I think that Shanks takes way too much credit for the way the records sound. Sure, he’s part of it, but if Jon wanted their sound to be different, it’d probably be …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-08-2022, 11:01 PM
Captain_jovi's Avatar
Captain_jovi Captain_jovi is offline
Moderator
This Post Feels Right
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Age: 39
Gender: male
Posts: 13,822
Send a message via AIM to Captain_jovi Send a message via MSN to Captain_jovi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by efpg0708 View Post
I think that Shanks takes way too much credit for the way the records sound. Sure, he’s part of it, but if Jon wanted their sound to be different, it’d probably be …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know if Shanks takes credit so much as everyone gives him the blame. Personally I think Jon's voice is a big part of the problem, the amount of digital processing on top of his voice has a lot to do with how the rest of the band is processed to me. But 2020 sure sounded a lot better.

But yeah, the buck stops with Jon. Shanks fought for Phil's Beautiful Drug solo so he gests some points in my books for that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman View Post
Don't make the mistake of thinking that even 1% of Bon Jovi fans are like you, because they aren't. Don't think you know how Bon Jovi fans think. You don't. You know yourself. Stick to that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.