Quote:
Originally Posted by steel_horse75
Found this interesting:
On Twitter Bon Jovi has 490,000 followers. Katy Perry has 14.2m followers.
On Facebook Bon Jovi have an impressive 15,667,452 members (likes) but Katy Perry has 38,701,313
Now do we put this down to Bon Jovi having older fans who may not want to "like" a Facebook page or "follow" tweets or is it that Katy Perry tweets her own stuff whereas Bon Jovi's is clearly not done by the band but instead done by someone in an office paid to do so.
Bon Jovi's tweets dont sound personal enough they all reek of a (really poor) marketing/media dept and the facebook page is too formal.
Am I looking too much into this or is it that in a time where these social media sites play such a huge part in peoples lives Bon Jovi have missed a trick and need to be more in touch with their fans??
|
Bon Jovi's Twitter is just another way for them to flog their products. If Jon actually went to the bother of using it himself they would get alot more followers.
Richie seems to have woken up to the fact that Twitter exists but Jon won't have any part of it.
I don't want him to be one of these sad celebrities that feels the need to share with us his every move, but just the occasional message would be nice.