Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
Yeah, I can't vote for any of the poll options as I find them far too short sighted and missing the real problem.
|
I agree. Imo they're more consequences of the same "crime".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
TLFR as a crime? No, I'm not crazy about the album at all...I thought more could be put into it..such as a full band effort with Tico playing drums. But the way you all rag on the actual arrangements..I find it ridiculous and childish. It's like you can't zero on what the real problem is with it..and it isn't the arrangements at all. If anything..the live DVD is what should have been done...end of story. There is nothing wrong with the arrangements..it's creative...if you guys want to come down on that..then frankly, you're idiots. Yes, let's discourage creativity within Bon Jovi..that's exactly what we need.
|
This is where I started finding your post pretty arrogant.
I appreciate TLFR for what it is, a one off experience, and they were right trying, though the result is way below my expectations.
I wouldn't rate it creative. I can't consider covering a song as creative as, well, creating one. Just the fact that they didn't have to write lyrics, ie... Most of the songs in there are just slowed down, and played in another mood. It's not what I call creation, and it's not musically as challenging as the band tried to sell it, it's messing around and probably having fun.
My friends and I like to play Highway To Hell country style, everything in it sounds different than the original yet I can't consider having created anything. We just changed, turned things around. It was fun, but certainly not creative. Now from a professional band to do a whole record like that is commercially ballsy, but artistically lazy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
The whole project was so impermanent and brief that the amount of griping out of you people was just over the top and laughable.
|
I think it reached the amount of cheer and admiration some gave it. I mean some people did call it a masterpiece...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
Setlist choices.....You want to talk about Set List crimes..you need to listen to other bands and find out just how bad it can be before even beginning to bitch about Bon Jovi's. No, I'm not satisfied with the set lists...but so far I'm happy that they have for the most part played the majority of each new album on each tour....that may be changing this time around..but it's too early to tell. It is never a good thing, even if you don't like the album, when they start playing a small number of songs surrounded by the "hits." in their sets. Every album should have it's day. As their set lists go.....a couple of spots need to be droped..but 3/4s of it is just fine....it seems like more because we are tired of hearing the same songs over and over...but.....I can get into Prayer and Bad Name just as easily as a new song or lesser played song....as long as the "INTENSITY" is behind it.
|
That's very true, but...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
Again..too many of you miss the point and fail to consider the greater scheme.
|
Do you really think you're above anyone else here? You're able to consider the greater scheme when too many of us are blinded... How Sebish
I think you're missing something too, imo.
The lack of intensity, soul, spirit, whatever you want to call it, is just a symptom.
The sickness is their lazyness, which I think is more or less inconscious, due to the fact that they don't feel challenged. They started with the challenge of becoming huge, they succeeded. Then they've had to survive the grunge era, they succeeded. All this with great albums, songs and tours. Then what? What is the challenge?
There is no music genre that really dominates the world, their fan base is large enough for them to sell millions and have a sold out tour. They don't feel the need to prove anything or to put any special effort in their work (studio and stage). Everything they've done since the challenge has faded is extremely basic. The music: shorter songs, hardly any real guitar solos anymore, same effects rehashed over and over again... the lyrics: Same subjects over and over again, more and more generic stuff... the shows : no pyro anymore, safe setlists, going through the motions...
All because they don't feel the need to give in addition to just sell. They need to be challenged and to have something to prove.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
The over looking of These Days and the first two albums is a negative aspect...I cannot fault this one....I just cannot be dramatic about it and call it a crime. They all had their day on their tour with a majority of songs being played from that respective album. This is why it's never a good thing for them to stop doing that.....an album you love may come along...and they will play 2-3 songs from it with the rest being the "hits." THEN you'll see the folly of bitching about too much of an album you don't like being played on tour. Yes, they could play at least one or two songs from These Days on a regular basis and it would be great to hear them update and play songs from the first two albums..but they don't....even if they did........well it doesn't solve the real problem
|
It wouldn't solve the problem, but would somehow be a sign that the problem is at least partly solved. It would mean they're not playing it as safe as they are now. If both Crush and Bounce, and even TLFR, can get at least one song in there, These Days certainly deserves on as well. Same for the first two albums.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bleeding Purist
The crime is lack of intensity and soul.
|
Well no, as I said , that is just the symptom. Imo the crime is not finding anything worth fighting, or rather working (they're professionals after all), for. They do not feel challenged and take their success for granted, as if the great albums they've released in the past granted them a forever successful career. They can't be more wrong than that. I mean, Jon is actually blaming people for sitting down during BJ shows. He's not even considering one minute the band that could be, if not boring, not as exciting as they were/can be.
I didn't vote on that poll. I don't agree with any of the propositions being a "crime". If "crime" there is, it's the incapacity of renewing their passion and the very simple, but so necessary, sheer love of music.
Ponrauil