Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ Mark Forums Read
 

Did John Shanks ruin Bon Jovi?

General BJ Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #81  
Old 01-12-2017, 08:20 AM
Becky's Avatar
Becky Becky is offline
Urban Ambassador
Crush
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Mississippi
Gender: female
Posts: 19,697
Default

Eveline, we are not disagreeing. I think we can both agree Jon and Richie lost their creative connection for now and they are both making better music without each other than the stagnant music they were making together where it seems like they felt like they had to say something universal rather than personal. I personally don't care about Richie's solo work. I didn't find it any different than bon Jovi by great significance, so I can live without it. But if his fans are happy with it, great. There is no competition IMHO. There's room for everyone.

Maybe one day they will want to work together again when they have something to say again. If the Eagles and Guns n Roses could do it.....
Reply With Quote

  #82  
Old 01-12-2017, 02:12 PM
Gabriel Shoes's Avatar
Gabriel Shoes Gabriel Shoes is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 23 Dec 2004
Location: Curitiba - Brazil
Age: 35
Gender: male
Posts: 641
Send a message via MSN to Gabriel Shoes
Default

There's a lot of people here (including me) that think KTF/CR/TD was their peak as artists. I do think These Days has something more over their other records, specially in songwriting, but if you stop to think about it, if they didn't do KTF and TD exactly the way those albums are, I bet Bon Jovi wouldn't survive the 90s. So, Crush has the same factor, if they didn't chose to go this route, I can hardly see Bon Jovi surviving de 2000s.

At the end of the day, Bon Jovi was just trying to survive, even if it was 90s or 2000s, Hey God or It's My Life, These Days or Say It Isn't So, This Ain't A Love Song or Thank You For Loving Me.
__________________

Well done, little buddy.

Last edited by Gabriel Shoes; 01-12-2017 at 02:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 02-08-2017, 08:10 PM
Myguitar's Avatar
Myguitar Myguitar is offline
Senior Member
Born to be my Baby
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: Mordland!
Age: 36
Gender: male
Posts: 551
Default

I think Jon brought in Shanks to make the band more "relevant" in today's pop scene. I cringe every time I hear auto-tune, but I die a little when it's Jovi. It's not the man himself, it's his production that's bad and has altered BJ's sound.

The band is very stagnant, THINFS is a very, very poor album, but it's consistent with the past 5 records or so, and it shows where the stagnation really is - Jon and John.
Richie is out doing his own thing and from the snippets we get here and there I think it sounds fresher, it's original, and more to form than anything Bon Jovi's done for a while. I'm looking forward to that album to really see what's what.
__________________
Life-long Jovist, Purist, Critic

BJ album rankings:
These Days, SWW, Jersey, KTF, Crush, HAND, Bounce, Circle, 7800F, Bon Jovi, THINFS, WAN, (then a million mile gap) LH;
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 02-09-2017, 12:08 AM
steel_horse75's Avatar
steel_horse75 steel_horse75 is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Freak
 
Join Date: 29 May 2007
Location: Romford
Age: 42
Gender: male
Posts: 3,616
Default Did John Shanks ruin Bon Jovi?

I'll be a lot happier when Richie and Jbj sort this out and he's back in the band.
Nothing against Phil x who is a great player or Shanks but their not Bon jovi.
Seeing just 3 original members makes me sad.
THINFS is a good album but imagine how much better it'd sound with a rejuvenated Richie on.
Also for me it's no coincidence that since Shanks has been associated with the band the standard of music has dropped significantly
__________________
We Came.
We Saw
We Kicked Your Ass

Follow me: @iam_emmo
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 02-09-2017, 02:12 AM
Alphavictim Alphavictim is offline
Senior Member
These Days
 
Join Date: 15 Sep 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 30
Gender: male
Posts: 2,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Becky View Post
Jon has way more to say without Richie than he's had to say with him in a very long time.
At least judging by THINFS, Job has more to say about Richie than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 02-09-2017, 10:20 AM
Eveline Eveline is offline
Senior Member
Born to be my Baby
 
Join Date: 11 Nov 2016
Location: Poland
Gender: female
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphavictim View Post
At least judging by THINFS, Job has more to say about Richie than anything else.
This! There are, however, a few songs with Richie in mind to be skilfully avoided on the tour...or maybe not ;]
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 02-11-2017, 03:53 AM
cqleonardo's Avatar
cqleonardo cqleonardo is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Fan
 
Join Date: 04 Oct 2016
Location: Rio
Gender: male
Posts: 162
Default

maybe, I think is a bad idea to keep the same staff besides the band on a lot of records, new production and engineers always can make the band sound new and fresh, I wanted at least 2 albums without Shanks, I wanted Bob Rock back, I don't know whats he is doing nowadays, I don't listen to anything he did since St Anger but I think he could give Bon Jovi a nice hard rock feeling again
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 02-17-2017, 06:03 PM
Jeeper's Avatar
Jeeper Jeeper is offline
Senior Member
Blame it on the love of posting
 
Join Date: 20 Jun 2007
Location: England
Age: 38
Gender: male
Posts: 1,151
Default

Jon's reliance on a producer he feels comfortable around and who can help mask his vocal decline, is the problem.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
THE ANSWER.........FAITH
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2.
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.