Quote:
Originally Posted by jovifan93
Well, not exactly current (2 years old), but interesting nevertheless! Thanks for that!
|
Thanks for pointing that out however considering that he's talking about a time dating back 25 years, I think 2 years would still be enough to warrant this 'current'... it's not like anything would be different if he gave the interview yesterday... my whole point to rendering this 'current' is the fact that he mentioned Phil....
Sent from my HTCD160LVW using Tapatalk