Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Aloha !
What's this all about? Slash has been filling up every song with his now trademark riffs and sounds, and the comment on "not being able to hold the guitar properly" is just silly.
|
Retrospectively speaking you are right. Spot on. In the context of Poison, he came across as such, no matter how he twists it around. The guys wanted a shredder, and Slash wasn't one and he'll never be. He doesn't have the technical ability to be one.
Quote:
|
This Slash bashing is just silly. People tend to think that in order to be a good guitar player you need to be very, very skilled, which isn't true. It's not what you can, it's how you use your own abilities. Slash has perfected his own style while Richie's been getting sloppier year after year.
|
I wasn't bashing Slash. I actually am a fan. By player I mean purely 'technique'. Sorry if that was misunderstood. I don't think he is even close to Sambora in terms of overall technique. And to be honest, overall, I think Slash regressed just as much as Richie. While he doesn't make the drunken mistakes so much (cause he's been sober more often!) he hasn't done anything memorable in ages. And live he's just soulless and boring whereas I still get excited by Richie (but this may be subjective)
Quote:
|
And as for Slash's simple guitar solo's; try playing any Slash solo the way Slash does them. There's not many who can, Axl's has 40 guitar players and yet none of them, with all their technical perfection could nail Sweet Child like Slash can.
|
That's such a different conversation. For example, Phil X who is technically brilliant was never able to play any Richie solo just like Richie. Technique is not the only factor that contributes to how a solo sounds. The tone, the feeling, the band around you. I'd even argue that Slash's solos never sounded again the way they sounded when he was in GnR. Not even with Velvet Revolver. I am sure Izzy played a part in that.
Quote:
|
I'm not saying Slash is technically better than Richie, but when comparing the two it's Slash with his so called limited skills who's done way more memorable stuff than Richie has. Just play any song Slash is on and people will recognize his playing style. Play any Richie Sambora song and no one knows who it is.
|
Again, we can argue about lots of your points in there. Many of Slash's solos are recognisable because they are part of massive hits. It's the same with some of Sambora's licks, riffs and solos ...Say the intro to Wanted, the riff in Bad Name, the solo in Keep The Faith, the talkbox in Prayer. If you told them both to record a random impro piece and ask people to name who the guitarist is, I doubt many would be able to instantly recognise either of them. Hell, people are more likely to recognise the Edge over Eddie Van Halen. Don't tell me you'd like to start that debate.
Quote:
|
If Slash was never much of a player then what makes a guitarist a player?
|
Again, overall I rate Slash highly. My point was specific to his technique rather than his overall sound or the actual bits he has written. In the end it's the BB King, John Lee Hooker, etc. debate. I mean, BB King says himself, he can't play basic chords - that's why he's not much of a player. He still is a great ****in' guitarist, because of his attitude, his songs, his sound, less so because of his playing ability.
I can see how people will have a different point of view, and that's fine. I won't go into a debate on this. It was just meant to clarify my own points of view. Hope they make more sense.