Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_jovi
... IF Jon were to forgive him and the creative juices were there and they dropped Shanks then hell yah that'd be ideal but I don't want him back if it's going to be by the numbers.
|
I don't know that
anybody would want him back if it's just going to be by the numbers. Like Rosa and Nikos said, if they aren't on the same page and there's no real desire to work together, they would probably wind up in the same place they are now with nothing remotely worthwhile to show for their effort.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_jovi
... Jon forgiving Richie doesn't completely make everything okay. If there's a bigger reason Richie left then we by all means should know it. If neither side wants to say then I'm sorry, but it's completely okay to feel how we do. It's not on us to play detective and find a bigger meaning then wanting to spend time with his daughter...
|
I wouldn't hold my breath to see if
they agree that "we should know it" if there was a bigger reason, especially if it would in any way reflect badly on Jon or the band. I'm realizing more and more that the only dirty laundry that can't get aired is Jon's. And that's not taking a shot at him. That's just a fact.
You've said several times that it's not our job to play detective or find a bigger meaning. I'm not trying to back you into a corner or challenge you in any way; but I'm curious. Do
you truly believe that when Richie left the band that he's been a part of, and that has been a part of him, for over 30 years, he had no reason that runs deeper than what we've been told? That he just decided not to show up?
Of course it's okay to feel the way you do. And I don't think Jon forgiving Richie would make you feel better about your cancelled shows, for sure. I can't imagine anything that
would at this point. If the resentment over that is still hanging around after all this time, my guess is that it probably won't go away any time soon. But as you said, you're allowed to carry a grudge. I tried to make it clear that I wasn't judging you or anybody else for how you feel. I just don't understand it. But that's my problem, not yours or theirs.
This isn't about Jon or Richie; it's about fan reactions. I'm confused about why some of the same people who are still so upset with Richie for canceling shows and letting people down saw absolutely nothing wrong with Jon canceling Denver twice in one month. Nearly every single person involved in that discussion felt bad for the Denver fans, but with one or two exceptions, there was no outrage directed towards Jon for breaking
his commitment to
them and letting
them down. Some even thought it was a smart business move. It was just understood that Jon HAD to reschedule MSG; so canceling Denver and letting those fans down, while unfortunate, was “unavoidable”. WTF? It wasn’t unavoidable.
Cancelling the MSG concert because Jon was sick was unavoidable. Rescheduling MSG at the expense of Denver was a
choice.
But, iirc, you weren’t the only one who couldn’t see a parallel between Richie letting people down because he didn’t follow through and Jon letting people down because he thought it was more important to reschedule a high-profile gig than it was to keep a commitment that he had already made to Denver.
I have to wonder if the people in Denver would agree with your rationale about broken trust. Or those in Cordoba, since Jon promised in 2013 to make up the shows that were cancelled due to Tico’s surgery “as soon as we can”. But just in the last week or so, he refused to work them into the schedule when he had the opportunity to do so this time around. Or how about the people who were planning to attend the NY State Fair a few years back, or the organizers who were hoping that Bon Jovi would boost the fair’s waning popularity, until a private gig upstaged them? Or Cleveland and Indy. I wonder if their trust needs to be earned back…
Like I said, I’m not judging anyone’s feelings or thought processes. And it’s not that I
want people to be pissed off at Jon. I don’t want people to resent either one of them. I just seriously don’t get it. I was disappointed by both Jon’s and Richie's decisions, but I was equally disappointed in both of them for breaking commitments and I didn't lose all faith in either one as a result. Shit happens.
I don't expect everyone to see things the way I do. But help me understand why the same people who turned their backs on Richie because of his lack of follow-through aren't just as pissed off at Jon for letting people down and not following through on
his commitments. Why does Richie get crucified while Jon gets a pass for doing the same damn thing? That's what I don't understand.
I know you can’t speak for everyone, but from your own perspective, can you help me see what it is that I'm missing? Is it because you aren’t as personally affected by Jon’s decisions as you were by Richie’s? I realize that you are convinced that Richie's shows were cancelled because of low ticket sales and that he lied when he said he had laryngitis; but I recall that someone raised the point that the Denver show hadn’t sold that well, yet no one jumped to the conclusion that Jon chose to reschedule MSG because Denver had lower ticket sales. Is it because you heard Jon sing with your own ears, so you believed he was sick; whereas you didn’t hear Richie “sound” sick? Surely it's not
just because you think Richie lied. If that were the case, I would think that you'd detest Jon since he lies like a rug when he thinks it's necessary. (Again, not a shot at him; just a statement of fact.)
Please don’t think I’m demanding an explanation; I'm not. And I’m not asking you justify or defend your feelings. I’m just curious, because it just
seems like such a double standard to me.