Aloha !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
Sebastiaan, if you actually took the time to read what I wrote, instead of being overly excited to argue & act like you know it all, you'd realize that there are three different scenarios going on here…..
|
I did read your post. And those 3 different scenarios are going on in your mind. You made them up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
1- Re-recording the Greatest Hits as in TLFR avoids paying all the original individual produces and original musicians AKA Alex. Probably why Jon opt to go in that direction vrs a Greatest Hits back then.
|
The band recorded TLFR in order to fullfil a contractual obligation. Jon promised the record company a record in 2003, went on to record acoustic live stuff but their live performances weren't up to par so the band went into the studio and re-recorded their greatest hits. It had nothing to do with them not wanting to pay producers again. It probably costs even more to hire a new producers for new songs than to repay them their share. Also, often producers just get their cut when the album is finished. They aren't part of the royalty scenario like a songwriter is.
That's scenario 1 wiped off the table.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
2- Yes, Alex was on OWN but in only two songs. He'll earn a lot less than playing on the entire album. Probably why the rest of the songs were from Hugh's day. Same with the Special Edition
|
Yes, those 2 songs because they had to come up with something from their early days, and yet they released the same stuff they'd released in 1998 and 1985. And that's because they started to record every live cut onwards from 1991. Not because they don't want Alec on the album. It's because they don't have every show from every tour before that year. That's the reason why there's only so few official Alec songs out there.
That's scenario 2 wiped off the table.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
3- As far as the Greatest Hits. There are 6 song writers. Jon, Richie, Dave, Desmond, Billy F, & Max (I'm not including the Runaway guy). These are the people who deserve royalties. Not some smuck who helped co-write two mediocre songs.
I think it’s less about more money in Jon's pocket, and more about Jon putting money in someone elses who he feels doesn't deserve it.
|
Why are you not including the Runaway guy? He co-wrote just as many songs as David Bryan did. Or as Billy Falcon did. What makes you think Karak therefore doesn't deserve his co-writing royalties? And who's up to say they're mediocre? You? According to you Jon won't release the songs off of Bounce because they're mediocre, yet Jon always seems to think that the higher a song charts the bigger it's right for a position in the set, and the better the song is. He doesn't measure the quality of a song by it's praise, he measures it by how many people have heard it. The more people have heard it, the bigger it's success. So why wouldn't Carlsson deserve it? He made sure that they had 2 big hits in 2002/2003, pretty much everyone knew Everyday back in those days, something Billy Falcon never achieved for them. He hired Carlsson, he did the job so therefore he doesn't deserve it?
I'm of the opinion that Misunderstood and Everyday both are better songs than When We Were Beautiful is, so according to your theory this means that I should say Falcon is some smuck who writes mediocre songs. They're co-writers. Jon and Richie have an idea, the co-writer makes it poppier or adds something. Martin, Carlsson, Falcon, Child, they're all co-writers, brought in to give them success. And Carlsson did exactly that.
So that's scenario 3 wiped off the table.
End of argument.
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan