Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Becky
Shallow? No, dear. I buy Richie's CDs to support his solo endeavers. I just prefer vocalist who don't sound like they're vomiting at the same time they're trying to sing. Richie puts WAY too much force into his vocals.
And, by the way, what IS the IQ of a throw rug? You've used that expression about 9 times since you registered. People who banter on about IQs sound rather foolish to someone like me who gives IQ tests for a living. Intelligence has NOTHING to do with liking what a singer SOUNDS like. It's personal preference. The attitude you have that you're right and anyone who disagrees with you is wrong only calls YOUR IQ into question. It's MUSIC, not calculus.
|
Well...this was very amusing.
First of all, you are not right. Liking something is most of the times as objective as subjective.
Then, I am 100% sure that if you put Jon and Richie in 2 rooms, make them sing, and ask people to judge them without knowing who they are, they would pick Richie.
RIchie has an impressive voice. It's outstanding. Still...I prefer Jon for a rock band.
I also prefer Axl ROSE over pretty much anybody, still he is not a good singer.
Bon Scott did not have the ange of Brian Johnson, still, most of teh fans prefer Bon.
It's a FACT that RICHIE is a better singer. That doesn't mean you have to like him better. I mean, I wouldn't like Pavarotti to replace Tom Araya in Slayer, now would I?
Oh, and whoever thinks that Richie's solo alabums are worse than Jon's than ...than you shoul reconsider.
11-28-2005, 06:04 AM
