Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphavictim
Or his drug use worsened and he missed a flight or whatever else.
|
I agree with richiefan95 and Thinny: it wasn't about performing. Richie was super productive and looked healthy for almost 2 years right up to Calgary,
and again right afterwards, well into 2014. IF substance abuse was the reason, then Richie getting too ****ed up to get on a plane is only way that would make sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphavictim
Jon's story makes way more sense than Richie's "I wanted to see my daughter" angle, which ammounted to a whole lot of nothing even early on. Like Thinny said - they were NOT a fan of having their dirty laundry out in the public. Why would they MAKE this up?
|
Why do people insist on ignoring Richie's initial statements (which had nothing to do with Ava); and totally disregard the fact that immediately after Jon first hinted at rehab, both he
and Richie
denied that alcohol and/or drugs had anything to do with Richie's departure?
For the umpteenth time, the
first reason Richie gave was that he and Jon weren't "happening"; and when he was asked what the obstacles were, he replied that it wasn't his place to say, that band business should stay in the band, so that's all he was going to say. That's about as close as you can get to saying there was friction between him and Jon, without airing the band's dirty laundry.
Ava wasn't given as a reason until November 2013, iirc; about the same time that Richie said there was
no longer any malice between him and Jon. Even then, it was clear that Ava was a smokescreen, a
convenient explanation that would keep people from looking too hard for any
other explanations that might involve Jon/BJ.
IMO, Jon and David are doing the same thing. Knowing that Richie's history is common knowledge, his addiction is a good smokescreen, a
convenient explanation people can readily accept, to keep them from looking for any
other reasons that might lead to Jon or the band.
I agree with you that Jon wouldn't make up something to give the band a grittier image; but I don't think he'd balk at muddying the waters with innuendo, true or false, if he believes it would protect the brand. They don't air
the band's dirty laundry, but Jon has never had a problem airing anybody's
personal laundry as long as he comes across as the good guy.