Quote:
Originally Posted by rainsong
Not that either of you care since you're both too busy with the little "love" affair you seem to have going but I probably used the inccorrect word when I said repetitive. What I meant was that sound and content wise those two albums are very close. Don't get me wrong I love both records but NJ is more of an extension of SWW than a completely new Bj record. Since that era BJ has made a point of having each record just a bit different than the last, sometimes with great success, sometimes not.
|
So all you were saying was that you think SWW and NJ are similar. Our mr. Knowitall here bashes me for not understanding you properly and wrote the following:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Aloha !
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by born_to_run
NJ was a repetition of SWW ? No way!
|
That's exactly what rainsong's saying, so what's your argument now? Another "offensive" post aimed at me?
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
|
So mr (or mrs.??) Rainsong: Can you once and for all make clear that mr supercool didn't get the point ? Another post where he makes a complete fool of himself. Sad but true. But I suppose his misunderstanding is just due to his coolness.
Others might say he never gets something (as I usually have to explain my posts at least twice).
So another proof of pure non-intelligence!
Embarrassing really!
OK after we made that clear: I can't see too many similarities of SWW and NJ - but NJ is surely and extension of the previous record exploring some new territories. oth great great albums indeed!
Still laughing my ass of about our mr. Supercool . Unbelievable!