Quote:
Originally Posted by milomom
This guy did what the author of that review you admired so much refused to do, Feet. They both took their preconceived notions about Bon Jovi to the show, but this guy actually took a look around to see if what he thought was so or not.
|
Just gave this a second read.
Had really only skimmed it first time round and this time caught that the opening paragraphs - "when David told me he was going to see Bon Jovi, I was amazed" were written by the paper's editor, not the author of the article (David, presumuably).
Which in terms of writing/style sums up exactly why this is a *bad* review - it treats the reader like children, who don't know that it *is* okay to go out and enjoy a Bon Jovi show, however uncool it may be.
The actual author of the review *did* arrive with his preconceived ideas - he *knew* he was going to enjoy Bon Jovi, he just thought that all of you guys out there reading were a bit too thick to get that the show would be fun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomom
but which one cared enough to experience the show before he wrote his review?
|
You and I both know that either of us could write a better review than that of the next o2 show before it has taken place.