Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Christo
I wonder if Bon Jovi could pull this off:
http://www.u2.com/news/index.php?mode=full&news_id=1832
It would appear not, as they don't even seem game to bring a full tour to Australia.
It's not like they aren't popular here, they've had 7 No. 1 albums and sold over 1,000,000 albums, which is about 15+ platinum sales in total. Maybe they should realise that people don't want to see them at half-arsed shows that they have had here in 2001 and 2002.
By the way, I paid the SAME price for a Rumba ticket to see 45 minutes of Bon Jovi (plus a couple of consolation acts) as I just have yesterday to get a ticket to a U2 stadium show. And I hardly think that a U2 show would be any cheaper to put on than a Bon Jovi show.
|
Exactly...the thing is that BJ do not need to tour here anymore...and that is pretty obvious with the past 3 tours missing this country.
Why they didn't with Crush being so big here is anyone's guess...but post that, we know that Jon only wants to play stadiums here..and the days of BJ being able to do that here are gone. They are still popular here, but it is waning...what in roads they made with a new audience [and they were substantial] with IML and Crush are beginning to disappear. I too have U2 tickets for Adelaide, having all but given up on Jovi coming here.
The article is very complimentary for the band and a good read...but it is starting to gripe me that the words 'world tour' keep being mentioned when it is not.
S.
Quote:
|
coman the person who posted the u2 link, why are u trying to compare bon jovi to u2 when u no that bon jovi are way above u2 lol
|
I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that this comment is said in jest.