Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

February 26, 2018 - Hard Rock Hotel Vegas (JBJ Solo)

Tour Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #121  
Old 03-06-2018, 06:11 PM
Supersonic's Avatar
Supersonic Supersonic is offline
The One And Only Real Backstage Killer
I'll Post When I'm Dead
 
Join Date: 03 Aug 2002
Location: Bangkok
Gender: male
Posts: 16,096
Send a message via MSN to Supersonic
Default

Aloha !

I'm sorry, as harsh as faith195325 sounds, she has a point.

There's a thing people not seem to understand here. Jon hasn't spend any of his own money on this stuff yet he's portrayed as some holy saint every time this stuff comes up on interviews. He's able to do run this foundation because he makes millions on ticket sales. Instead of paying taxes over his income, he deducts his spendings on the foundation on his taxes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Becky View Post
The sauce has a percentage of proceeds going to Jon’s foundation to feed the hungry and house the homeless. Damn, what evil motives!
It keeps surprising me how Americans say these things. It's as if they just don't understand their own tax system. I'm not someone who's studied economics, but I think I get the gist of it, so please correct me if I'm wrong here.

Let's say Jon makes 3.000.000 over a show at MSG. He's got to pay income taxes over them, let's say roughly 25%, which is 720.00 dollars. He decides to spend 20.000 on the Soul Foundation. He now has to pay 720.000 dollars. Now I'm not sure if the amount of money he's able to deduct is capped, but everyone likes a tax deducation, no matter how big or small. Now imagine being able to decide what to do with that money. Would you say no?

The sauce company spending a percentage of proceeds on Jon's foundation also means they'll get a tax deducation. There's hardly any personal money spend here. I'd go even further and say the sauce company wouldn't exist if it'd not get the tax deducations in the first place. Jon's able to afford a bunch of good lawyers, I'm sure they'd be able to find ways to come up with stuff like this.

Yes, he spends his free time talking about it, but him talking about it on TV creates for a better image as well, both for the Foundation and for him. A better image means more goodwill from people to buy your stuff. There's people out there believing the proceeds from ticket sales go to charity, so yeah, it works wonders for him. If you honestly believe he'd set up something like this with money coming from his own pocket you're delusional, the man overcharges everything that's got his name on it.

I'm not saying Jon's a careless wanker because I honestly believe he cares for New Jersey, this goes all the way back to a time long before his foundation existed. I very much doubt he'd go through this lengths would he not get something back from it though, and I'm not talking about the way his ego is being stroked. Once you go back to people who pay all their taxes, don't go on TV, don't get all the good press over it, and really do it because they want to give something to the community I can see why it rubs those people the wrong way. They don't get the same tax break Jon does, yet could probably use it a lot more.

Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #122  
Old 03-06-2018, 06:45 PM
Becky's Avatar
Becky Becky is offline
Retired Super Moderator
Crush
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Mississippi
Gender: female
Posts: 20,293
Default

faith, you simply seem oblivious to the fact that a “celebrity endorsement” of a cause puts the cause in the spotlight. I never would have heard of RAINN if I were not a Tori Amos fan. More good comes from Jon’s work than not. I save cats and I rant on Facebook about people spaying, neutering, and the idiocy of “free to a good home.” I’m not famous, but I use what little influence I have to make a difference. Jon has a lot more influence than me. We all can work within our sphere. His sphere is earth.

PS: I heard this morning that the worst seats in the building for Pink’s tour are $250, last row, upper level. One more hole in your accusations of Bon Jovi charging excessively compared to peers.Are they expensive? Hell yes. Are they inconsistent with other major tours? Not at all.
__________________
Life is short. Be sure to spend as much time as possible on the internet arguing about politics and entertainment.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 03-06-2018, 07:07 PM
Rdkopper's Avatar
Rdkopper Rdkopper is offline
Senior Member
The Distance
 
Join Date: 04 Oct 2008
Gender: male
Posts: 8,750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersonic View Post
Aloha !

I'm sorry, as harsh as faith195325 sounds, she has a point.

There's a thing people not seem to understand here. Jon hasn't spend any of his own money on this stuff yet he's portrayed as some holy saint every time this stuff comes up on interviews. He's able to do run this foundation because he makes millions on ticket sales. Instead of paying taxes over his income, he deducts his spendings on the foundation on his taxes.



It keeps surprising me how Americans say these things. It's as if they just don't understand their own tax system. I'm not someone who's studied economics, but I think I get the gist of it, so please correct me if I'm wrong here.

Let's say Jon makes 3.000.000 over a show at MSG. He's got to pay income taxes over them, let's say roughly 25%, which is 720.00 dollars. He decides to spend 20.000 on the Soul Foundation. He now has to pay 720.000 dollars. Now I'm not sure if the amount of money he's able to deduct is capped, but everyone likes a tax deducation, no matter how big or small. Now imagine being able to decide what to do with that money. Would you say no?

The sauce company spending a percentage of proceeds on Jon's foundation also means they'll get a tax deducation. There's hardly any personal money spend here. I'd go even further and say the sauce company wouldn't exist if it'd not get the tax deducations in the first place. Jon's able to afford a bunch of good lawyers, I'm sure they'd be able to find ways to come up with stuff like this.

Yes, he spends his free time talking about it, but him talking about it on TV creates for a better image as well, both for the Foundation and for him. A better image means more goodwill from people to buy your stuff. There's people out there believing the proceeds from ticket sales go to charity, so yeah, it works wonders for him. If you honestly believe he'd set up something like this with money coming from his own pocket you're delusional, the man overcharges everything that's got his name on it.

I'm not saying Jon's a careless wanker because I honestly believe he cares for New Jersey, this goes all the way back to a time long before his foundation existed. I very much doubt he'd go through this lengths would he not get something back from it though, and I'm not talking about the way his ego is being stroked. Once you go back to people who pay all their taxes, don't go on TV, don't get all the good press over it, and really do it because they want to give something to the community I can see why it rubs those people the wrong way. They don't get the same tax break Jon does, yet could probably use it a lot more.

Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan

American's having tax write-offs is common practice regardless if you're Rich, Poor, Celebrity, or Whatever. Anyone with a good accountant has write-offs. Jon being a wealthy celebrity does the same thing every other American does but it's just on a much larger scale...

The ultimate goal is to lower your tax bracket however it's not wash. If Jon writes off that million dollars he gave to Oprah, he doesn't get a million dollars back at the end of the year. It will just lower his gross income by that amount. In addition, it all depends on what tax bracket he's in but let's just use 25% for simple math. If he gives 1 Million Dollars to Oprah and writes that off, it's like give 750 thousand of his own money away.

I know first hand Jon paid millions to restructure and build the Soul Kitchen out of his own pocket. Sure he wrote it off but again, Jon didn't get back nearly what he put into it.

I'm not even a Liberal but Faith1985 is just a complete dipshit for making a statement like this:
"The moment there was the vegas shooting Jon is using it to market it with the vegasstrong-tag. "
__________________
World’s Most Professional Bon Jovi Fan!!!
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 03-06-2018, 08:04 PM
Supersonic's Avatar
Supersonic Supersonic is offline
The One And Only Real Backstage Killer
I'll Post When I'm Dead
 
Join Date: 03 Aug 2002
Location: Bangkok
Gender: male
Posts: 16,096
Send a message via MSN to Supersonic
Default

Aloha !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper View Post
The ultimate goal is to lower your tax bracket however it's not wash. If Jon writes off that million dollars he gave to Oprah, he doesn't get a million dollars back at the end of the year. It will just lower his gross income by that amount. In addition, it all depends on what tax bracket he's in but let's just use 25% for simple math. If he gives 1 Million Dollars to Oprah and writes that off, it's like give 750 thousand of his own money away.
Your simple math is wrong because that's not how it works.

Let's say you make 10.000.000 dollars. You've got to pay 50% taxes over this. But you spend 5.000.000 on the Soul Foundation in the same year, meaning it's tax deductable and you've now only made 5.000.000. So you wind up in a different tax bracket, let's say the one for 25%. You suddenly need to pay just 25% over the 5.000.000 as opposed to 50% over 10.000.000.

50% of 10.000.000 dollars = 5.000.000.
25% of 5.000.000 = 1.250.000

Instead of paying 5.000.000 on taxes he spends it on the charity foundation and winds up having to pay just 1.250.000 dollars on taxes, so no, he didn't have to spend a dollar on this stuff. That's how it works according to an American who explained your system to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper View Post
I know first hand Jon paid millions to restructure and build the Soul Kitchen out of his own pocket. Sure he wrote it off but again, Jon didn't get back nearly what he put into it.
Sure. You know first hand. They handed you the books?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper View Post
I'm not even a Liberal but Faith1985 is just a complete dipshit for making a statement like this:
"The moment there was the vegas shooting Jon is using it to market it with the vegasstrong-tag. "
Yeah, that's a bit far-fetched, I didn't see that one but I agree, it's a bit foolish to go there.

Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 03-06-2018, 08:29 PM
Walleris's Avatar
Walleris Walleris is online now
Senior Member
These Days
 
Join Date: 13 Feb 2010
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Age: 30
Gender: male
Posts: 2,698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersonic View Post
Aloha !


Your simple math is wrong because that's not how it works.

Let's say you make 10.000.000 dollars. You've got to pay 50% taxes over this. But you spend 5.000.000 on the Soul Foundation in the same year, meaning it's tax deductable and you've now only made 5.000.000. So you wind up in a different tax bracket, let's say the one for 25%. You suddenly need to pay just 25% over the 5.000.000 as opposed to 50% over 10.000.000.

50% of 10.000.000 dollars = 5.000.000.
25% of 5.000.000 = 1.250.000

Instead of paying 5.000.000 on taxes he spends it on the charity foundation and winds up having to pay just 1.250.000 dollars on taxes, so no, he didn't have to spend a dollar on this stuff. That's how it works according to an American who explained your system to me.
If we use your example, Jon keeps 3,750,000 to himself instead of 5,000,000 he would if he didn't do the write-off. He still ends up spending a large chunk off his own pocket. Does he not deserve get credit for that, even if the faulty US tax system is a major assistance?

I also get the whole "doing charity for image" angle, but his work is much lower-profile from a publicity standpoint than some of his peers (e.g. Bono, Beyonce, Taylor Swift just to name a few) and is directly related to local community. A lot of it is family work done by Dorothea which probably gets no coverage for obvious reasons. Then there are things like meeting that leukemia kid 3 years ago or so that would've gotten no publicity if there wasn't for the kid's family spreading the news, as Jon showed up just by himself with no photographers or anything like that.

I crap on the guy's voice and decisions to still keep touring on a regular basis. And he can surely be a dick sometimes, on and off the stage. And while he's no perfect angel Becky portrays him to be, I believe from being a die-hard fan for 10 years that his track record is one of a genuinely good dude overall. But in the end, nobody knows for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 03-06-2018, 08:59 PM
bjcrazycpa's Avatar
bjcrazycpa bjcrazycpa is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Geek
 
Join Date: 30 Aug 2002
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Age: 59
Gender: female
Posts: 6,867
Default

Since I am a U.S. tax CPA, I want to clarify just one little detail. If you have a private foundation and you are considered a "disqualified person" defined as a trustee, director, manager or officer, you cannot take a charitable contribution deduction on your own personal tax return for any monies given to the private foundation. That would be a violation of the IRS self dealing rules. So, although Jon gets to take tax deductions for other charitable donations he can't take them for his own foundation. Also, another detail to consider, itemized deductions are phased out completely once adjusted gross income exceeds just over about $315K. So, to be honest, Jon's not getting a lot of tax benefit from any money he gives away.

And I'm sure that is more than y'all wanted to know about US income tax rules ha ha!!
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 03-06-2018, 09:01 PM
Becky's Avatar
Becky Becky is offline
Retired Super Moderator
Crush
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Mississippi
Gender: female
Posts: 20,293
Default

I certainly don’t think he’s an angel. But he is certainly not the evil, manipulative, greedy, abusive, power hungry dictator than some folks around here make him out to be either. Someone has to present the other side of the coin, and if that’s me, so be it. Every time Rosa (or anyone else) says something positive about Jon people treat her like she’s an idiot. I don’t care if anyone thinks I’m an idiot because the feeling is probably mutual. 😆
__________________
Life is short. Be sure to spend as much time as possible on the internet arguing about politics and entertainment.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 03-06-2018, 09:05 PM
Rdkopper's Avatar
Rdkopper Rdkopper is offline
Senior Member
The Distance
 
Join Date: 04 Oct 2008
Gender: male
Posts: 8,750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walleris View Post
If we use your example, Jon keeps 3,750,000 to himself instead of 5,000,000 he would if he didn't do the write-off. He still ends up spending a large chunk off his own pocket. Does he not deserve get credit for that, even if the faulty US tax system is a major assistance?

I also get the whole "doing charity for image" angle, but his work is much lower-profile from a publicity standpoint than some of his peers (e.g. Bono, Beyonce, Taylor Swift just to name a few) and is directly related to local community. A lot of it is family work done by Dorothea which probably gets no coverage for obvious reasons. Then there are things like meeting that leukemia kid 3 years ago or so that would've gotten no publicity if there wasn't for the kid's family spreading the news, as Jon showed up just by himself with no photographers or anything like that.

I crap on the guy's voice and decisions to still keep touring on a regular basis. And he can surely be a dick sometimes, on and off the stage. And while he's no perfect angel Becky portrays him to be, I believe from being a die-hard fan for 10 years that his track record is one of a genuinely good dude overall. But in the end, nobody knows for sure.
I don't know what he's talking about but I agree with this...

Sent from my HTCD160LVW using Tapatalk
__________________
World’s Most Professional Bon Jovi Fan!!!
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 03-06-2018, 09:08 PM
Rdkopper's Avatar
Rdkopper Rdkopper is offline
Senior Member
The Distance
 
Join Date: 04 Oct 2008
Gender: male
Posts: 8,750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjcrazycpa View Post
Since I am a U.S. tax CPA, I want to clarify just one little detail. If you have a private foundation and you are considered a "disqualified person" defined as a trustee, director, manager or officer, you cannot take a charitable contribution deduction on your own personal tax return for any monies given to the private foundation. That would be a violation of the IRS self dealing rules. So, although Jon gets to take tax deductions for other charitable donations he can't take them for his own foundation. Also, another detail to consider, itemized deductions are phased out completely once adjusted gross income exceeds just over about $315K. So, to be honest, Jon's not getting a lot of tax benefit from any money he gives away.

And I'm sure that is more than y'all wanted to know about US income tax rules ha ha!!
I didn't realize they capped standardized deductions at 315K... although if it's over, can't it fall into the next tax year????

Sent from my HTCD160LVW using Tapatalk
__________________
World’s Most Professional Bon Jovi Fan!!!

Last edited by Rdkopper; 03-06-2018 at 09:13 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 03-06-2018, 09:11 PM
bjcrazycpa's Avatar
bjcrazycpa bjcrazycpa is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Geek
 
Join Date: 30 Aug 2002
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Age: 59
Gender: female
Posts: 6,867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper View Post
I didn't realize they capped standardized deductions at 315K... although if it's over, can't it fall into he next tax year????

Sent from my HTCD160LVW using Tapatalk
Nope, it's not like a capital loss. There is no carry forward.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.