Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

No Richie on current leg of the tour

Tour Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1191  
Old 04-10-2013, 12:05 PM
RS8MB0R8's Avatar
RS8MB0R8 RS8MB0R8 is offline
Senior Member
It's my post
 
Join Date: 06 Oct 2002
Location: Fife
Age: 41
Gender: male
Posts: 4,481
Default

I'm not saying it's going to turn out this way but my belief was that it was always going to come crashing down eventually. They've been riding the wave of mediocrity for so long it was only going to take something like this to derail the whole thing.

I genuinely feel the band should have called it quits years ago but instead they're limping to a finish-line that Jon obviously felt was farther away than it may actually be. Unless this whole Richie fiasco turns out to have been blown out of all proportion and he's actually just stubbed his toe or lost his bongos, Jon faces a huge decision as to whether to push on and try to regain some credibility here or to concede that there is no band or brand without everyone pulling in the same direction.

It's sad to think how far the band has fallen when you look back on their career.
__________________
www.gavin-buckley.com
Reply With Quote
  #1192  
Old 04-10-2013, 12:21 PM
RonJovi RonJovi is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS8MB0R8 View Post
I'm not saying it's going to turn out this way but my belief was that it was always going to come crashing down eventually. They've been riding the wave of mediocrity for so long it was only going to take something like this to derail the whole thing.

I genuinely feel the band should have called it quits years ago but instead they're limping to a finish-line that Jon obviously felt was farther away than it may actually be. Unless this whole Richie fiasco turns out to have been blown out of all proportion and he's actually just stubbed his toe or lost his bongos, Jon faces a huge decision as to whether to push on and try to regain some credibility here or to concede that there is no band or brand without everyone pulling in the same direction.

It's sad to think how far the band has fallen when you look back on their career.
Interesting to hear that Bob Rock said before KTF, they were a gang whereas once Jon fired Doc McGee and oversaw the band's management, it became Jon and the band. Was that the point that it all started to go wrong?

Jon's always believed and spun it that him taking over the management of the band saved it but is it possible that it was actually planting the seeds of the band's decline? Probably a discussion for another thread but the decline has been pretty big over the last number of years.
Reply With Quote
  #1193  
Old 04-10-2013, 12:43 PM
CKatz CKatz is offline
Senior Member
Born to be my Baby
 
Join Date: 12 Feb 2013
Gender: female
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonJovi View Post
Interesting to hear that Bob Rock said before KTF, they were a gang whereas once Jon fired Doc McGee and oversaw the band's management, it became Jon and the band. Was that the point that it all started to go wrong?

Jon's always believed and spun it that him taking over the management of the band saved it but is it possible that it was actually planting the seeds of the band's decline? Probably a discussion for another thread but the decline has been pretty big over the last number of years.
You raise very interesting questions! Definately worth discussing.
Reply With Quote
  #1194  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:06 PM
jovigirloz jovigirloz is offline
Senior Member
Blame it on the love of posting
 
Join Date: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKatz View Post
You raise very interesting questions! Definately worth discussing.
yes, a great topic to be discussed I never thought of it being the beginning of the end. It's a bit like having your parent as your manager. Never works, conflict of interest.
__________________
Etihad Stadium...December 11 2010.. bring it on...
Reply With Quote
  #1195  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:13 PM
RonJovi RonJovi is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jovigirloz View Post
yes, a great topic to be discussed I never thought of it being the beginning of the end. It's a bit like having your parent as your manager. Never works, conflict of interest.
Me neither. Because Keep the Faith and These Days (and Always & Saturday Night) followed, I always assumed that Jon was right in his interpretation because all their peers disappeared when Bon Jovi survived.

But then they did so internationally rather than in the US in the 90s and it could be argued that Doc laid the foundations for that international success in the 80s. Not saying I subscribe to that because the quality of the music and new direction obviously helped but there is a valid argument there.

All that being said, you still have to give Jon credit whatever you view. They've been immensely successful in the 20 years since and that's quite an achievement regardless of your opinion of the quality of their music.
Reply With Quote
  #1196  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:19 PM
crashed's Avatar
crashed crashed is offline
Senior Member
Destination any Forum
 
Join Date: 25 Jun 2007
Location: SCOTLAND
Age: 47
Gender: male
Posts: 3,899
Send a message via MSN to crashed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS8MB0R8 View Post
I'm not saying it's going to turn out this way but my belief was that it was always going to come crashing down eventually. They've been riding the wave of mediocrity for so long it was only going to take something like this to derail the whole thing.

I genuinely feel the band should have called it quits years ago but instead they're limping to a finish-line that Jon obviously felt was farther away than it may actually be. Unless this whole Richie fiasco turns out to have been blown out of all proportion and he's actually just stubbed his toe or lost his bongos, Jon faces a huge decision as to whether to push on and try to regain some credibility here or to concede that there is no band or brand without everyone pulling in the same direction.

It's sad to think how far the band has fallen when you look back on their career.
I really don’t see it this way at all.

They still put on great shows, and I enjoy the music they even release today, as still do a lot of people, so why should they call it a day unless they as a band aren’t enjoying it anymore?

Of course they are not at their creative or performance peak anymore, which isn’t surprising. No band is after a 30 year career. But neither are they playing country fairs, like many of their 80’s counterparts and I think the band would call it a day before it ever got to that sort of level.

This Richie thing – whatever it is – may not even ever come to light. I’ve no doubt he’ll be back playing with the band before long, but after this tour I can’t see another for awhile, but I don’t think you’ll see Bon Jovi doing an REM and announcing their retirement.
__________________
"the life of the party....tears of a clown....can't hear a heartbreak....the music's too loud."
Reply With Quote
  #1197  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:26 PM
Beaky's Avatar
Beaky Beaky is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 21 Sep 2005
Gender: male
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crashed View Post
I really don’t see it this way at all.

They still put on great shows, and I enjoy the music they even release today, as still do a lot of people, so why should they call it a day unless they as a band aren’t enjoying it anymore?

Of course they are not at their creative or performance peak anymore, which isn’t surprising. No band is after a 30 year career. But neither are they playing country fairs, like many of their 80’s counterparts and I think the band would call it a day before it ever got to that sort of level.

This Richie thing – whatever it is – may not even ever come to light. I’ve no doubt he’ll be back playing with the band before long, but after this tour I can’t see another for awhile, but I don’t think you’ll see Bon Jovi doing an REM and announcing their retirement.
You are still hugely dedicated to the band, though and I am not knocking that one bit but your number is dwindling with every album and every tour that sees set lists diluted with newer, inferior songs.

The 'inferior' part might be my opinion but it's tough to argue against the fact that Jon looks in the mirror at his band and sees one thing, while the rest of the world sees something else.

I will give you one example... The headline act, Sunday night at Isle of Wight is not reserved for a contemporary, relevant rock band. They weren't booked for that slot because of the great HAND album...

Just to add - as I mentioned months ago, if Jon doesn't up his game and start being a frontman again, the days of him winning over crowds who aren't there to see him will be gone as well. I mentioned in another thread about how friends who weren't Jovi fans became converts in the 90s because of the energy of this band live. Age is NOT a barrier to this; proven by how Jon seems to have upped his game since Richie's no-show...

Last edited by Beaky; 04-10-2013 at 01:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #1198  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:53 PM
Roll Roll is offline
Senior Member
Hardest Part is the Night
 
Join Date: 08 Jan 2013
Location: Paris
Gender: male
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonJovi View Post
Interesting to hear that Bob Rock said before KTF, they were a gang whereas once Jon fired Doc McGee and oversaw the band's management, it became Jon and the band. Was that the point that it all started to go wrong?

Jon's always believed and spun it that him taking over the management of the band saved it but is it possible that it was actually planting the seeds of the band's decline? Probably a discussion for another thread but the decline has been pretty big over the last number of years.
I couldn't disagree more. When you put out 4 albums in a row so successful, both creatively and commercially, as SWW, NJ, KTF and TD, how can you expect to get better than that? The band declined in the early 2000s because it was meant to be. Today Jon might sit and decide to write another Dry County, I'm convinced he couldn't. So I take what this band has to offer today and if I enjoy it, that's fine.
Reply With Quote
  #1199  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:55 PM
steel_horse75's Avatar
steel_horse75 steel_horse75 is offline
Senior Member
Price of posting
 
Join Date: 29 May 2007
Location: Klopp Army
Age: 49
Gender: male
Posts: 5,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crashed View Post
I really don’t see it this way at all.

They still put on great shows, and I enjoy the music they even release today, as still do a lot of people, so why should they call it a day unless they as a band aren’t enjoying it anymore?

Of course they are not at their creative or performance peak anymore, which isn’t surprising. No band is after a 30 year career. But neither are they playing country fairs, like many of their 80’s counterparts and I think the band would call it a day before it ever got to that sort of level.

This Richie thing – whatever it is – may not even ever come to light. I’ve no doubt he’ll be back playing with the band before long, but after this tour I can’t see another for awhile, but I don’t think you’ll see Bon Jovi doing an REM and announcing their retirement.
I agree with this.
I will say this though...........
The band imo didnt need to release WAN and tour so soon after The Circle tour came to an end.
They should have vanished for some years and then come back hungry. I think the album and tour so soon is all to do with JBJ and not seeing BJ in the list of highest grocing touring acts for last 18 months - not due to low numbers but due to them not touring.
He wants them back on that list and knows they will top it at the end of 2013/14.
Maybe this tour is too much for RS so soon after Circle tour ended, his own solo album and tour plus now this huge tour?
As I said. They should have come back in say late 2015 early 2016.
They have the fanbase to do so and its not as if people would forget who they were.
__________________
Wembley Arena 90, Wembley Arena 93, MK Bowl 93, Wembley Stadium 95, MK Bowl 96, Wembley Stadium 00, MK Bowl 01, Hyde Park 03, MK Bowl 06, o2 07, Twickenham 08, o2 10 (x2), Hyde Park 13, London Palladium 16, Wembley 19
Follow me: @iam_emmo
Reply With Quote
  #1200  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:56 PM
steel_horse75's Avatar
steel_horse75 steel_horse75 is offline
Senior Member
Price of posting
 
Join Date: 29 May 2007
Location: Klopp Army
Age: 49
Gender: male
Posts: 5,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roll View Post
I couldn't disagree more. When you put out 4 albums in a row so successful, both creatively and commercially, as SWW, NJ, KTF and TD, how can you expect to get better than that? The band declined in the early 2000s because it was meant to be. Today Jon might sit and decide to write another Dry County, I'm convinced he couldn't. So I take what this band has to offer today and if I enjoy it, that's fine.
yeah agree.

The band peaked with those 4 albums - no way on earth they can keep that standard going. No one could. Maybe the Beatles but no one else.
__________________
Wembley Arena 90, Wembley Arena 93, MK Bowl 93, Wembley Stadium 95, MK Bowl 96, Wembley Stadium 00, MK Bowl 01, Hyde Park 03, MK Bowl 06, o2 07, Twickenham 08, o2 10 (x2), Hyde Park 13, London Palladium 16, Wembley 19
Follow me: @iam_emmo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.