Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

No Richie on current leg of the tour

Tour Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1201  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:05 PM
Living_on_my_Hair's Avatar
Living_on_my_Hair Living_on_my_Hair is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Freak
 
Join Date: 24 Apr 2003
Location: Ireland
Gender: male
Posts: 3,553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steel_horse75 View Post
yeah agree.

The band peaked with those 4 albums - no way on earth they can keep that standard going. No one could. Maybe the Beatles but no one else.
The Beatles were together for a pretty measly 10 year period, and released a lot of crap and filler material in addition to obviously a handful of classic albums (10+ albums in a few years plus endless compilations, quantity over quality in that case..'64 or '65, can't remember)

Not comparing Bon Jovi's music to the Beatles, but SWW, NJ, KTF, TD (and Blaze?) during a 10 year period is a far more consistent effort in my opinion than the Beatles output over a similar time. I love the Beatles of course, just saying. Bon Jovi's run from 86-96 is very impressive, and more prolific than some people give them credit for.

Andi
__________________
Don't look up on your movie screens
In record stores or magazines
Close your eyes and you will see
That you are all you really need
JBJ - I believe

"Sambora's face is a mask of joyous disbelief, as if previously unaware of his ability to play the instrument at all. Reaching the last fistful of notes, he does a fair impression of a man who is actually ejaculating into his jet black flares."
. . . Ben Mitchell, Q Magazine

Last edited by Living_on_my_Hair; 04-10-2013 at 02:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #1202  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:17 PM
RonJovi RonJovi is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roll View Post
I couldn't disagree more. When you put out 4 albums in a row so successful, both creatively and commercially, as SWW, NJ, KTF and TD, how can you expect to get better than that? The band declined in the early 2000s because it was meant to be. Today Jon might sit and decide to write another Dry County, I'm convinced he couldn't. So I take what this band has to offer today and if I enjoy it, that's fine.
You could well be right. But I guess there are two dimensions to this for me.

1. The natural decline
2. Decisions exacerbating the decline

All bands get worse as they get older so BJ are no different in that respect. Someone mentioned The Beatles but they only lasted a decade and you look at McCartney's music now. It's not a patch on earlier work so, even for the best, decline is going to happen at some point.

However, for Bon Jovi, is the decline partly a result of the band being sidelined because Jon believes that his is the only vision that matters?

Take IML as a small example. It's a great tune but that "Like Frankie said I did it my way" line is not great in my opinion. Richie didn't want it in there but Jon openly admits that he forced the issue and got that line in there. He says it like it was a good thing, I'm not so sure.

We all know that for SWW, Richie was the driving force in Prayer making the album. That was when they were 'a gang' rather than Jon and band. If SWW was made in 1992-2013, would the song have made the record or would Jon have just said "My band, my management, I'm the CEO and I make the decisions"?

Look at Bounce. Some dogshit songs on there (AALY, YHMFH) and some great demos left out (Another Reason To Believe, Postcards From The Wasteland). If Richie has more of a say, do those songs make the record? They aren't as good as KTF and TD songs IMO but they are better than what made the record. It seems that even Jon and Richie acknowledge that Bounce (or parts of it) was sub-standard now.

The increased focus on politicising the songs seems more a Jon thing to me than Richie. I believe Richie would rather be writing stuff like You Can Only Get So High and Seven Years Gone while Jon wants to write calls to arms (because they've been successful before) and political songs (because he has developed a very admirable social conscience).

I'm not saying that the decline started with KTF. It didn't. KTF and TD are the band's two best efforts for my money. But were they that good because Jon took control or in spite of Jon taking control? And were the seeds of the pace and scale of the decline sewn with Jon taking control of the management of the band and the sidelining of Richie (and David) as songwriters?

Like I say, it's hard to knock Jon because they have had incredible success and it's a discussion that we won't get a definitive answer to. Just interesting to knock ideas about.

Last edited by RonJovi; 04-10-2013 at 02:22 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #1203  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:23 PM
crashed's Avatar
crashed crashed is offline
Senior Member
Destination any Forum
 
Join Date: 25 Jun 2007
Location: SCOTLAND
Age: 47
Gender: male
Posts: 3,899
Send a message via MSN to crashed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaky View Post
You are still hugely dedicated to the band, though and I am not knocking that one bit but your number is dwindling with every album and every tour that sees set lists diluted with newer, inferior songs.

The 'inferior' part might be my opinion but it's tough to argue against the fact that Jon looks in the mirror at his band and sees one thing, while the rest of the world sees something else.

I will give you one example... The headline act, Sunday night at Isle of Wight is not reserved for a contemporary, relevant rock band. They weren't booked for that slot because of the great HAND album...

Just to add - as I mentioned months ago, if Jon doesn't up his game and start being a frontman again, the days of him winning over crowds who aren't there to see him will be gone as well. I mentioned in another thread about how friends who weren't Jovi fans became converts in the 90s because of the energy of this band live. Age is NOT a barrier to this; proven by how Jon seems to have upped his game since Richie's no-show...
Oh I know I'm a dwindling number. It's okay, I'm a Bon Jovi fan - I'm used to being the underdog

But this band has meant so much to me over the years it would be a hard thing to let go of - but I want to be clear - this in no way makes me blind to their faults.

It's not just me though. My wife's been a fan longer than I have and she enjoys the music too. Brokenpromiseland became her favourite song ever.
__________________
"the life of the party....tears of a clown....can't hear a heartbreak....the music's too loud."
Reply With Quote
  #1204  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:41 PM
danfan's Avatar
danfan danfan is offline
Senior Member
Just posting
 
Join Date: 11 Nov 2002
Location: USA
Age: 48
Gender: male
Posts: 5,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steel_horse75 View Post
I agree with this.
I will say this though...........
The band imo didnt need to release WAN and tour so soon after The Circle tour came to an end.
They should have vanished for some years and then come back hungry. I think the album and tour so soon is all to do with JBJ and not seeing BJ in the list of highest grocing touring acts for last 18 months - not due to low numbers but due to them not touring.
He wants them back on that list and knows they will top it at the end of 2013/14.
Maybe this tour is too much for RS so soon after Circle tour ended, his own solo album and tour plus now this huge tour?
As I said. They should have come back in say late 2015 early 2016.
They have the fanbase to do so and its not as if people would forget who they were.
I was thinking about this earlier. Jon is a work-horse. At least when it comes to writing and recording music. So, why not just do a solo record? Is he afraid of failure without the band? Can he not tolerate playing in anything less than 20,000 seat arenas?

Jon admitted Tico didn't want to go back to work so soon. We all know Dave has a successful career writing music for Broadway. Hugh is essentially just a session player, so what does he care? Richie obviously cares about his solo career, even if few people do.

I think it comes down to Jon being afraid to take too much time off, coming back and having it be labeled as nostalgia or just a money machine, even though we all know that's what it is anyways.
__________________
Men don't do what they like.
Men get wives and jobs to keep them from what they like.
Reply With Quote
  #1205  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:44 PM
crashed's Avatar
crashed crashed is offline
Senior Member
Destination any Forum
 
Join Date: 25 Jun 2007
Location: SCOTLAND
Age: 47
Gender: male
Posts: 3,899
Send a message via MSN to crashed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danfan View Post
I was thinking about this earlier. Jon is a work-horse. At least when it comes to writing and recording music. So, why not just do a solo record? Is he afraid of failure without the band? Can he not tolerate playing in anything less than 20,000 seat arenas?

Jon admitted Tico didn't want to go back to work so soon. We all know Dave has a successful career writing music for Broadway. Hugh is essentially just a session player, so what does he care? Richie obviously cares about his solo career, even if few people do.

I think it comes down to Jon being afraid to take too much time off, coming back and having it be labeled as nostalgia or just a money machine, even though we all know that's what it is anyways.
I'm not even sure it's that, though Jon being a work-a-holic is certainly part of it, I think it being the 30 year anniversary also has something to do with being out on the road again so soon.
__________________
"the life of the party....tears of a clown....can't hear a heartbreak....the music's too loud."
Reply With Quote
  #1206  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:53 PM
steel_horse75's Avatar
steel_horse75 steel_horse75 is offline
Senior Member
Price of posting
 
Join Date: 29 May 2007
Location: Klopp Army
Age: 49
Gender: male
Posts: 5,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danfan View Post
I was thinking about this earlier. Jon is a work-horse. At least when it comes to writing and recording music. So, why not just do a solo record? Is he afraid of failure without the band? Can he not tolerate playing in anything less than 20,000 seat arenas?

Jon admitted Tico didn't want to go back to work so soon. We all know Dave has a successful career writing music for Broadway. Hugh is essentially just a session player, so what does he care? Richie obviously cares about his solo career, even if few people do.

I think it comes down to Jon being afraid to take too much time off, coming back and having it be labeled as nostalgia or just a money machine, even though we all know that's what it is anyways.
Whether he likes it or not they are pretty much a nostalgia act now.
Look at how many new songs get dropped from the setlist so quickly.
OK Lost Highway aside - how many songs from HAND, Crush, Bounce and The Circle are played? People want the best songs and these albums dont contain the best songs. Good songs yes but great songs? No.
So where are the best songs from the band? 83-96. The old days.
__________________
Wembley Arena 90, Wembley Arena 93, MK Bowl 93, Wembley Stadium 95, MK Bowl 96, Wembley Stadium 00, MK Bowl 01, Hyde Park 03, MK Bowl 06, o2 07, Twickenham 08, o2 10 (x2), Hyde Park 13, London Palladium 16, Wembley 19
Follow me: @iam_emmo
Reply With Quote
  #1207  
Old 04-10-2013, 02:57 PM
RonJovi RonJovi is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steel_horse75 View Post
Whether he likes it or not they are pretty much a nostalgia act now.
Look at how many new songs get dropped from the setlist so quickly.
OK Lost Highway aside - how many songs from HAND, Crush, Bounce and The Circle are played? People want the best songs and these albums dont contain the best songs. Good songs yes but great songs? No.
So where are the best songs from the band? 83-96. The old days.
For many it's 83-88 sadly. These Days songs haven't been on the setlists either.

KTF, BOR, SIBSN, and Always have been the most regular 90s songs on the setlists and every one of those has been dropped at some stage over the last few years.

Agree with the sentiment of your post though.
Reply With Quote
  #1208  
Old 04-10-2013, 03:02 PM
crashed's Avatar
crashed crashed is offline
Senior Member
Destination any Forum
 
Join Date: 25 Jun 2007
Location: SCOTLAND
Age: 47
Gender: male
Posts: 3,899
Send a message via MSN to crashed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steel_horse75 View Post
Whether he likes it or not they are pretty much a nostalgia act now.
Look at how many new songs get dropped from the setlist so quickly.
OK Lost Highway aside - how many songs from HAND, Crush, Bounce and The Circle are played? People want the best songs and these albums dont contain the best songs. Good songs yes but great songs? No.
So where are the best songs from the band? 83-96. The old days.
In which case though, any band who continues after they made it big is a nostalgia act.

No-one goes to see the Foo's because of Wasting Light, no matter how good it was. They go to hear Everlong and Learn To Fly.
__________________
"the life of the party....tears of a clown....can't hear a heartbreak....the music's too loud."
Reply With Quote
  #1209  
Old 04-10-2013, 03:06 PM
Beaky's Avatar
Beaky Beaky is offline
Senior Member
Lay your Posts on Me
 
Join Date: 21 Sep 2005
Gender: male
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crashed View Post
Oh I know I'm a dwindling number. It's okay, I'm a Bon Jovi fan - I'm used to being the underdog

But this band has meant so much to me over the years it would be a hard thing to let go of - but I want to be clear - this in no way makes me blind to their faults.

It's not just me though. My wife's been a fan longer than I have and she enjoys the music too. Brokenpromiseland became her favourite song ever.
Fair play to her; for my money, that tune is one of the best they've done on the last few albums and, along with a lot of other decent tunes I would have loved to see it get an airing live.

I am the same as you. We are all the same, even the most disillusioned people on this board still show a passion for it; which is an indication of just how far this band can burrow into your musical consciousness and despite the despair at what Jon continues to brand 'Bon Jovi' and kid himself is relevant, I still live in hope for something of substance... and maybe the odd dash from one side of the stage to the other, for old time's sake.
Reply With Quote
  #1210  
Old 04-10-2013, 03:06 PM
fairtex444 fairtex444 is offline
Senior Member
Next 100 Posts
 
Join Date: 19 May 2012
Gender: male
Posts: 112
Default

I think there is some sort of "curse" over WAN...since the begining it just wasn't meant to be...I think this will turn out as one of the biggest mistakes in their career
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.