Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathleen
I think that all of the above arguments have been gone over before - many times. For whatever reason he left - he had enough or his addictions got the better of him - he left his brothers (not just Jon) high and dry. And that was after signing a contract for the tour.
Sorry - I don't care anymore why he did it - his actions were despicable. The way he did it is what I cannot forgive.
|
It seems you may have skipped over at least one "of the above arguments."
According to Jon, there
was no formal agreement and there was no obligation, because there was
no need for a contract. So I'm not sure what contract you're referring to. Not that having a signed contract makes walking away right or wrong, any more than a verbal agreement or handshake would; but since you chose to make a point of that, I just wanted to clarify.
While I'm at it, let me clarify one other thing. I don't think Richie was right to walk away, either,
unless he had a very good reason, not
only for walking away, but also for doing it the
way he did. Since I still don't know what his reasons were, I can't say if his actions were despicable and horribly wrong, or not. It's not a big deal to me one way or another; because, in my world, there is very little that's unforgivable anyway. But I still like to keep the few facts we have straight, when possible, before forming opinions - whatever they are.
There is obviously still interest in discussing the subject because it keeps cropping up on various threads. I've said before that the mods have tried to limit the discussions to the Richie Sambora thread, and if people wanted, specifically, to launch into yet another discussion about Richie, it would be easy enough to keep it contained. But the problem is the discussions don't start out as "Richie" discussions. They keep coming up because, love him or hate him, Richie was so integral to Bon Jovi that it's hard to discuss any aspect of the band
without bringing him into it; and then one thing just leads to another.