Aloha !
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
I can read and I understand,if you claim that those are big markets why they dont tour them every time both?
|
Because, like I just said, due to a **** up in 2010 with promoters deals well through and the market was ignored. Still, to use your own argument. If Eastern Europe is such a great place, why didn't they come back to Croatia and Bulgaria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
Big markets for every band in Europe are Germany,UK and maybe France with Austria with multiple shows. I mean rarely both at same tour:
CRUSH TOUR -both
OWN TOUR -both
BOUNCE TOUR -both
HAND TOUR - Holland only
LH TOUR -both
CIRCLE TOUR - Holland only
LIVE TOUR - Belgium only
BWC TOUR - none of them
THINFS TOUR - both
They earned more money because of tickets price not attendance and its not always money first,theyve enjoyed shows in Croatia,Romania,Greece,Turkey,much better audience than in Holland and Belgium.
|
Yes, it is about the money first. If there's money to be made promoters are willing to invest as the band will get their fee. If the band won't get their fee a show won't take place.
As for audiences being better, maybe. I don't really care. This is your Balkan pride, I reckon. It doesn't really matter for me nor does it for Bon Jovi.
You keep trying to push your own agenda by making up facts and ignoring other random things just so you can validate your idea on how there should be more shows in Eastern Europe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
I didnt say they tour France,I wrote for every band those are big markets,BJ is not that happy with France.
|
No, you just said a big market is France.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
Big markets are those with multiple shows,not one per country because all countries are big markets then.
|
No, they're not. Like I just said, big markets are those with steady income. As of now, Norway's become a big market. Last tour they did 2 shows there in front of 45.000 people and made 6 million. They'd have to play in front of 90.000 people in Eastern Europe to make the same money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
I apologize to forum members because of this non stop conflict between some forum members and me. I dont do anything random about band,I collect everything.I have everything that band did-over 200 concerts mostly proshot,audio everything,attendance per every tour,solo project from every band member and audio and videos from them too and so on. So when I claim something I dont need to go detail like Seb to convince others I am smart and know everything,I have numbers,collection that most of you dont have.
|
Yeah, I would also like to apologize. Seeing as to how the size of your "collection" matters, I have a far bigger "collection" than rokenrola so forgive me for trying to stick to the facts when some delusioned poster like rokenrola spouts off bullshit and then feels the need to attack users whenever he's proven wrong. Please forgive me for this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
Belgium and Holland are,believe me or not,at the bottom in Europe for the band when attendance is subject,they earned more money because og high prices there and they are not big markets for any band,just a one or two date to tour and go by.
|
No, they're not. For someone who "has everything" I reckon you ought to look at your attendance list just one more time.
But still, again, for the third time, attendance figures don't really matter when the final gross per show is the same.
What do you think costs more? Travelling your stage 3.000 kilometers for 3 shows or traveling your stage 1.000 kilometers for 3 shows? Driving an entire production to Eastern Europe takes 2 days. That's 2 days you'd have to pay a crew while they're essentially not doing much but travelling. You completely ignore logistics.
But again, I apologize for "trying to prove I am smart".
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan