Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RS8MB0R8
My point was obviously missed. Get rid of the boxset tracks and put in tracks that actually were great enough to make it to the actual studio albums instead. If you're gonna nit-pick, then you're missing my point.
And I agree, 7 new tracks is way too many off of a new album. Yes, it is better than 'Crush' or 'Bounce' but cut a couple and put some older 'well-loved' stuff in.
I knew people would jump at the first sign of dissatisfaction but the fact still remains - they are still playing crappy covers when they've released enough of their own great material to fill a whole day let alone an evening, they are playing songs off of the boxset when they've released enough of their own great material to fill a gig and they are including too many new tracks - a third of a show for new tracks?!?!
I don't care how much you moan about my moaning but the above hardly allows for an even spread of music from their catalogue which is what we have all been griping about since forever! They haven't solved the problem, they've simply gone to a different extreme, which I might add, was the whole point of my first post (just in case you missed it)!
|
No no, your point was clear. VERY clear. I just simply disagree. I didn't mean to nitpick about the Why aren't you dead thing. I just thought "If he lets an error like that slip in, just how much has he been paying attention to the setlists". In the end, if you're not going to the show, why does it matter?