Aloha !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro BadName
2) Apart from the core set, they should vary every night. Why? Because many hard core fans do many shows and would like to listen to different songs; because it makes the set list more unpredictable for the fans who follow their set lists before attending to the shows; ultimately because it shows the band is not on auto-pilot, and that the set list is a work in progress, that is never actually done, before the end of the show.
|
This is just not true.
I've seen some artists doing the same show on their tour multiple times and wasn't bored, never thought it was predictable, and they never were on auto-pilot and you know why? Because half of their set had not been played the previous tour. The last time I did this is some time ago, but I'd like to bring up Eric Clapton. He plays an average of 18 songs per set, and 9 of the 18 songs that night I had never heard before.
If the core of your setlist contains songs that a lot of people haven't heard in a long time they don't really care about a shitload of variatons, since they're looking forward to hearing song X that night, even if they have to hear it 10 times this tour. If the core of a setlist is great, 3 variatons is enough.
We only want variaton because the core of the setlist sucks nowadays. There wasn't much demand for variaton on the 1993, 1995 and 1996 tour because all of them were killer no filler. People still bring up the 1996 tour as an example of great variaton but the truth is there was no variaton. It's just that they only see a great setlist every night, something that rarely happens nowadays. A great setlist happens only 1 out of 10 shows, which is why we want them to vary it. Not to make it more spontaneous, but to get a chance to hear those songs that are played on that 1 show.
Do you honestly believe people would complain if Dry County, Hey God and Something To Believe In would be played every night?
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan