Aloha !
No one in this topic said Bon Jovi are small, don't twist words here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
but you must ask yourself -can U2 and Stones tour so much often like Jovi? I think they can't!
|
Ahem;
U2 played, in a period of 9 years (2001-2010) 111 shows in Europe.
The Rolling Stones played, in a period of 3 years (2003-2006) 94 shos in Europe.
Bon Jovi played, in a period of 11 years (2000-2011) 115 shows in Europe.
Now we all know Jon put a limit on the number of shows he wanted to do abroad, however, he also refused to play at places U2 and the Stones did simply because promoters wouldn't book them in a venue just as big as theirs because they knew they couldn't sell half the amount of tickets. Add to this that the Stones played in stadiums twice the size Bon Jovi plays in, it should be clear that Bon Jovi are not as big as they claim they are.
What it boils down to is that Jon and his issues of always being overlooked are starting to show up by them needing to adjust numbers in order to be able to say that they sold out every show. I follow other bands around simply because I'm interested in the logistics behind such a thing, and I can assure you that U2 doesn't claim that every show is sold out, simply by adjusting the numbers. All this bragging that Jon does about numbers would make sense if it was true but sadly it isn't. It's his behaviour of overcompensating of his own shortcomings by making everything bigger than it actually is.
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan