Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_jovi
But again, based on what? Why do we think there's some magical formula behind those songs that will make people think "These guys are still alright"? Those singles aren't turds on the same level that any other song isn't going to change peoples minds about the band. The cache and novelty of IML long wore off by 2010. Who Says was received well, but the country version. 2010 on wasn't about bad singles, it was about and oversaturated band that needed to go away and take longer between projects. All in my own opinion.
|
I'm not disagreeing with anything you wrote here. Perhaps to be more direct: I think, in Europe, there is a large cohort of general (rock) audience that is not actively following Jovi but ofc know of them, know the hits, will listen radio when new or old Jovi song comes on and will, in varying degree, buy new stuff or merch or go on a stadium in summer tour.
But what comes on after HAND until now from new stuff is basically tired, AC pop or some turd (IMO) that is trying to catch completely different markets. In our earlier discussions I got the sense that it's completely different in the US.
My intuition is that releasing to radio and some promo (for example, when tour hits Europe) a song that is more akin to rock sound would do some good in legacy and general opinion terms (not necessarily commercial, especially as years go by). Case in point is Living proof in fact, it rocked some boats, it was all over the rock radio in Italy (which is a big part of major mainstream radio in Europe) when it was released, podcasts were talking about Jovi being back to rock roots, etc. And it was not even promoted at all.
It's easy to say now after the fact, but releasing Any Other Day or Brokenpromiseland or Blood in the Water in Europe would not bring new hit singles by any measure, but would bring some credentials (similar how Hey God or Saturday Night or Dry County brought it in the 90s). Again, my take ofc, not a fact