Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_jovi
We'll never know WHY there were less guitars, my point wasn't Richie wanted more or less guitars, it's that his first release post release isn't as guitar-centric as one would expect. As pop music I'm enjoying this. As a Richie release I'm on the fence.
|
Music is very subjective and I respect your opinion; but I don't understand. If you're enjoying it, why does it need to be qualified as pop music or as a Richie release? I either like a song (enjoy it, hate it, whatever the reaction is) or I don't. If it happens to be pop, fine. Whether it's a Richie release or a Willie Nelson release or Metallica release, if I like it as a pop (country, blues, rock) song, why would I be on the fence about it, just based on who releases it? I don't get the need for distinction.
I think I've said before that, imo, people's expectations can set them up to immediately dislike something just because it isn't what they expected to hear from a particular artist. IIRC, that was part of the reason why a lot of fans didn't like AOTL, or thought it was "lame". Because of Richie's rep as the hard rocker in BJ as you said, when he said he wanted more freedom to express himself creatively, people assumed that meant he wanted to rock out. They were excited about it, especially if that was the element they felt had been lacking in BJ's more recent releases. Then when his self-expression had more of a pop sensibility, they felt let down because it wasn't what
they wanted or thought it would be. So then it became, "He wanted freedom to do
THAT?"
Well, yeah... apparently so. 😊
It baffles me why fans want to put artists in a box and slap a label on them before they can determine if they like what they do, or not. Maybe I misunderstood what you meant, or maybe it's just me, but I don't get it.