Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinny
I think that the majority of people that would want to see Richie would go regardless..
|
But you thinking that does not mean a lot. I am not saying I think people wouldn't go, I am saying that I would not go. As such, I represent a definite percentage of people who would not attend an acoustic show. No opinion involved, instead a demonstrable number (me, one).
Of course, rarely is anyone alone, so I guess at least some would share my view and would not attend an acoustic show. Out of 1,000 people, the demonstrable percentage of people who would not attend an acoustic gig is 0.0010%. If I am alone in my view I will certainly not represent a problem for Richie's attendance numbers but, again, I doubt I am alone.
Now, the question then becomes what number of people would only attend an acoustic show (avoiding an electric gig entirely) and what number would only attend an electric show (avoiding the acoustic)?
My point is, describing any touring activity involving Richie as a no-brainer denies what the factors in the debate are.
Editing in because I forgot you talked about smaller venues for acoustic shows. Yeah, I get that but still think that still means Richie alienating some fans.
I have a question for you as this is in your career space. How does an artist like Richie measure demand? I mean, no recent album, no recent shows, not a major name but famous enough? Is that on the promoter end, surveys or just a shot in the dark?