17 years in prison for teenager having consensual oral sex

Exactly. At least William bothered to read the article and picked up on the most important parts of it.

ACLU Wants to Lower Sexual Age of Consent to Thirteen
Saturday, October 04, 2003

By Sam Kastensmidt

According to the Kansas Attorney General, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a brief with a Kansas state appeals court arguing that the state’s sexual age of consent laws should be lowered to thirteen years of age.

This request comes as the ACLU is defending 18-year-old homosexual Matthew Limon, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled 14-year-old boy at a group home in Paola, Kansas. These charges were nothing new to Limon’s history. This was his third conviction; as a result, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. Though his sentence is well within the current law dictated by the Kansas state legislature, the ACLU believes Matthew Limon should be released from prison and that the state should not show distinctions between homosexuals, heterosexuals, or those who have sex with teenagers.

Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline told reporters, “The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states specifically in its brief that it is a constitutional right for any child age 13 and older to consent to have sex with anyone.”


Traditional Family Under Attack

On September 30, Kline appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor to discuss the case. Attorney General Kline told Bill O’Reilly, “It is an absolutely remarkable assault on the authority of the family… When your [13-year-old] daughter walks out the door and says, ‘I’m going to meet my 40-year-old boyfriend,’ and you try to guide her, parent her, and say, ‘No that’s not going to happen,’ and she holds up an ACLU card and says, ‘Call my attorney,’ then we are living in a different type of America.”

Apparently, this is the vision of the ACLU.

“I am just stunned that the ACLU is saying that a child of 13 or 14 has a constitutional right to make a decision to have sex with an adult,” responded O’Reilly, who was previously unaware of the ACLU’s motives. “If this continues, we’re not going to be living in America anymore. We’re going to be living in some country with no boundaries.”

__________________________________________________ ___________


So...according to the ACLU and all the armchair judges here it's ok for a repeat child sex offender to hide behind a gay label? Would this be acceptable for a heterosexual child sex offender?

ACLU Wants to Lower Sexual Age of Consent to Thirteen
Saturday, October 04, 2003

By Sam Kastensmidt

According to the Kansas Attorney General, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a brief with a Kansas state appeals court arguing that the state’s sexual age of consent laws should be lowered to thirteen years of age.

This request comes as the ACLU is defending 18-year-old homosexual Matthew Limon, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled 14-year-old boy at a group home in Paola, Kansas. These charges were nothing new to Limon’s history. This was his third conviction; as a result, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. Though his sentence is well within the current law dictated by the Kansas state legislature, the ACLU believes Matthew Limon should be released from prison and that the state should not show distinctions between homosexuals, heterosexuals, or those who have sex with teenagers.

Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline told reporters, “The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states specifically in its brief that it is a constitutional right for any child age 13 and older to consent to have sex with anyone.”


Traditional Family Under Attack

On September 30, Kline appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor to discuss the case. Attorney General Kline told Bill O’Reilly, “It is an absolutely remarkable assault on the authority of the family… When your [13-year-old] daughter walks out the door and says, ‘I’m going to meet my 40-year-old boyfriend,’ and you try to guide her, parent her, and say, ‘No that’s not going to happen,’ and she holds up an ACLU card and says, ‘Call my attorney,’ then we are living in a different type of America.”

Apparently, this is the vision of the ACLU.

“I am just stunned that the ACLU is saying that a child of 13 or 14 has a constitutional right to make a decision to have sex with an adult,” responded O’Reilly, who was previously unaware of the ACLU’s motives. “If this continues, we’re not going to be living in America anymore. We’re going to be living in some country with no boundaries.”

__________________________________________________ ___________


So...according to the ACLU and all the armchair judges here it's ok for a repeat child sex offender to hide behind a gay label? Would this be acceptable for a heterosexual child sex offender?

ACLU Wants to Lower Sexual Age of Consent to Thirteen
Saturday, October 04, 2003

By Sam Kastensmidt

According to the Kansas Attorney General, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a brief with a Kansas state appeals court arguing that the state’s sexual age of consent laws should be lowered to thirteen years of age.

This request comes as the ACLU is defending 18-year-old homosexual Matthew Limon, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled 14-year-old boy at a group home in Paola, Kansas. These charges were nothing new to Limon’s history. This was his third conviction; as a result, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. Though his sentence is well within the current law dictated by the Kansas state legislature, the ACLU believes Matthew Limon should be released from prison and that the state should not show distinctions between homosexuals, heterosexuals, or those who have sex with teenagers.

Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline told reporters, “The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states specifically in its brief that it is a constitutional right for any child age 13 and older to consent to have sex with anyone.”


Traditional Family Under Attack

On September 30, Kline appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor to discuss the case. Attorney General Kline told Bill O’Reilly, “It is an absolutely remarkable assault on the authority of the family… When your [13-year-old] daughter walks out the door and says, ‘I’m going to meet my 40-year-old boyfriend,’ and you try to guide her, parent her, and say, ‘No that’s not going to happen,’ and she holds up an ACLU card and says, ‘Call my attorney,’ then we are living in a different type of America.”

Apparently, this is the vision of the ACLU.

“I am just stunned that the ACLU is saying that a child of 13 or 14 has a constitutional right to make a decision to have sex with an adult,” responded O’Reilly, who was previously unaware of the ACLU’s motives. “If this continues, we’re not going to be living in America anymore. We’re going to be living in some country with no boundaries.”

__________________________________________________ ___________


So...according to the ACLU and all the armchair judges here it's ok for a repeat child sex offender to hide behind a gay label? Would this be acceptable for a heterosexual child sex offender?

ACLU Wants to Lower Sexual Age of Consent to Thirteen
Saturday, October 04, 2003

By Sam Kastensmidt

According to the Kansas Attorney General, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a brief with a Kansas state appeals court arguing that the state’s sexual age of consent laws should be lowered to thirteen years of age.

This request comes as the ACLU is defending 18-year-old homosexual Matthew Limon, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled 14-year-old boy at a group home in Paola, Kansas. These charges were nothing new to Limon’s history. This was his third conviction; as a result, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. Though his sentence is well within the current law dictated by the Kansas state legislature, the ACLU believes Matthew Limon should be released from prison and that the state should not show distinctions between homosexuals, heterosexuals, or those who have sex with teenagers.

Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline told reporters, “The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states specifically in its brief that it is a constitutional right for any child age 13 and older to consent to have sex with anyone.”


Traditional Family Under Attack

On September 30, Kline appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor to discuss the case. Attorney General Kline told Bill O’Reilly, “It is an absolutely remarkable assault on the authority of the family… When your [13-year-old] daughter walks out the door and says, ‘I’m going to meet my 40-year-old boyfriend,’ and you try to guide her, parent her, and say, ‘No that’s not going to happen,’ and she holds up an ACLU card and says, ‘Call my attorney,’ then we are living in a different type of America.”

Apparently, this is the vision of the ACLU.

“I am just stunned that the ACLU is saying that a child of 13 or 14 has a constitutional right to make a decision to have sex with an adult,” responded O’Reilly, who was previously unaware of the ACLU’s motives. “If this continues, we’re not going to be living in America anymore. We’re going to be living in some country with no boundaries.”

__________________________________________________ ___________


So...according to the ACLU and all the armchair judges here it's ok for a repeat child sex offender to commit the crime if he's gay? Would this be acceptable for a heterosexual child sex offender?

The minor wasn't the only one with a potential IQ of a 3 or 5 year old!

This is what is wrong here! The law should NOT differentiate between the sexes of the offenders!!!! Though, clearly that is the ONLY reason this guy has received a sentence like he did.

and what exactly would those be mongoose?

The homophobic propaganda maybe?????

How come when I read it I didn't think it was an islamic country?
Stop this attitude, it hurts!

This request comes as the ACLU is defending 18-year-old homosexual Matthew Limon, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled 14-year-old boy at a group home in Paola, Kansas. These charges were nothing new to Limon’s history. This was his third conviction; as a result, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison
That is not discrimination thats a bloody pervert bloody hell are you lot that desperate to create 'homophobic propaganda' that you are defending a paedo!. This makes me sick it really does i cant belive you can find this ok and the only thing thats wrong is hes been treated unfairly. Now my belive is the same regardless of sexuality any person over 18 and has sex or makes advances toward anyone the know is under 18 should be locked away for good its disgusting perverted and emotionaly destructive to the victim.

he might not be a paedo cos if hes got a mental age of 5 or whatever then hes gonna have the mind of a child, so its not the same as if he was an adult who knows hes an adult. he would see himself as a child having sex with another child, not as an adult having sex with a child.
id defend him - and i think this is why the others are defending him - cos of the homophobia, and also cos he shouldnt be put in prison cos hes mentally unwell. i wouldnt defend a paedo and i think most ppl wouldnt either. they shouldnt be putting him in jail, they should put him in care. would u put a 5 year old in jail?