Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DevilsSon
What I meant is that everything mentioned in the article is attributed to the democrats EXCLUSIVELY. Which is bollocks. Republicans contributed towards the same social issues. It's not like the republicans never considered bringing electricity to some god forsaken villages. And it's plenty of republicans who for example defend the all the protectionist acts who keep the sugar industry running. And there's plenty of other examples. Once again, the issues discusses by your stories are achievements which should NOT be exclusively attributed to the democrats. Am I clear enough now?
|
Stuff like quality standards in whatever the industry were never initiated by the right wing. And that works for any country, not just the US. Just take Ralph Nader's history with the car industry and what he had to face and go through, when that was just obvious safety issues.
Find me one thing in that story that is wrongly attributed to the dems and I'll reconsider my position.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DevilsSon
Then why do you even argue with me? That's what I said from the beginning. Praising this one but blaming a republican who doesn't do anything different is hypocritical. That's all I stated. Read again.
|
I'm not arguing, I'm discussing
. And I'm doing so because you also stated that the story was a brainwash attempt and I disagree.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DevilsSon
An invented story? It's not an invented story. Most of the things in it are "harder facts" than proportion to which the facts in your nice story are to be attributed to the democrats only. It's the implications to which the author alludes what makes that text to be ...disgusting really.
|
By "invented story" I was referring to the day in the life of Joe Republican story, not the article that pretends to be serious and backed up. And no, I'm sorry, the article is not about harder facts. It's about details in Obama's life (who gives a flying **** about his student room mates?) that are twisted into major issues when they are not.
Would a guy like Colin Powell swin across the pond to support a potential terrorist friend?
A guy can bring stuff like that up on the net and US intelligence doesn't care? They've sent strangers to Guantanamo for less than what this guy implies in his article.
Can't be that serious now can it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DevilsSon
Partially agree with this. Just imagine we wrote a great book together. I wrote 40 percent of it and you wrote 60 percent of it. And then some critic would tell my fans: "Stupid fans of DevilsSon, they keep on preaching him while in fact Ponrauil has written the parts which they like best" The story is pro-dems but at the same time it is heavily discrediting the republicans and to me it's equally bad. And as i said before, the two articles are obviously addressing different social strata. While I find your satire really witty and amusing, I find the Obama article disgusting, still there is no difference in purpose.
|
Well I do see a difference in purpose. To me it's not the same purpose to say "Open your eyes and see some of what we've accomplished in the past" than to say "Open your eyes and see what a danger this one man may be".
Ponrauil