let me explain again:

hm....its like this: everybody's individual needs must fit human ethics and evryone should behave accordingly...the state provides the political structures for this. so you can still keep your individualism, but also be aware and act with people around you. you have freedoms, but restrictions are also neccessary

it also means that in order to have a satisfied community, people must have material wealth ... at least to an extent so they dont suffer from hunger or other basic needs. only then can a functioning state be developed

the problem is that everybody longs for more material wealth and superiority....people are never satisfied. thats the problem. in theory his assumption is great, but in reality it doesnt work like this