Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StoneDeaf
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spunkywho
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StoneDeaf
Well, I do agree that there is and should always be a possibility of choise, to sell or not to sell whatever in question. Only this particular case, the reason behind not-to-sell verdict is what I do/did find amusing. But like I said, it's America. News about censorship from there doesn't really surprise me.
|
why do you choose to believe the opening line of this thread vs. the official explanation of headquarters? |
Because I think all matters in usa are not always as they appear as. First u do something for reasons unknown, then cook up an explanation that u think will satisfy the public. That doesn't always mean there's any bit of truth involved. Like I said, time and time again I am not surprised by any news concerning censorship in usa. I just find it somewhat amusing.
to avoid misunderstandings.....
"you" doesn't mean you, just a general expression. |
But a store not selling a particular cd isn't even censorhip.
So, you say all matters in the usa aren't always what they seem -- now that would go both ways wouldn't it? Journalist loving the idea of a good juicy story of Starbucks boycotting Springsteen, when in fact, they decided to showcase a different band for that month.
05-07-2005, 07:39 PM
