Gary Glitter

Agreed. I kinda like Dr. Phil.

Uh huh, very good. Well, at least we all know how gulable you are.


Wrong. They address child sex abuse but that report is primarily focused on the sexual abuse that took place in the diocise of Ferns over the past 30 years at the hands of the catholic church.

Wow. Yeah those two cases totally prove your point. How about actually reading The Ferns Report and you'll see in those cases the abusers were all men (obviously) and most were over fourty.

That means those stats are completely usless when talking about paedophilia.
All I'm basing my assertions on is info I've come across, I never claimed it was absolute fact, that's why I opened this discussion to see what people think is the reason behind what makes a person develop this condition, but you were clearly too immature to carry on such a discussion.
I'm sure the info is on the web somewhere, I already gave you a link to a site that talks of that, and yeah I could search around for hours looking for stats, but honestly, I have far better things to be doing, and I don't have to feed my ego, unlike some here. If you don't believe what I'm saying, well whatever. If you really want find stats, search through these sites, I'm sure you'll find some stuff.

http://www.academy-group.com/

http://www.fbi.gov

Also, track down documentaries with The Academy Group where they talk extensively at times about paedophilia. Watch a program called FBI Files on The Discovery Channel, where you'll see plenty of such cases.

Good luck.....



Phil

So, explain to me how the Ferns report sheds light on the issue of pedophilia as a whole? The report deals exclusively with the sexual abuse against catholic priests - unless you think that sexual abuse and pedophilia only exists between boys and catholic priests, the report is rather useless as a blanket statement.




actually those stats are a lot more useful than the ferns report as the stats do not focus on a niche of pedophiles. Statutory rape is not reported enough to scew the statistics in this case.


Sorry Phil, but apparently you are unable to support your views - both verbally and via references.

I've posted a link, Ponrauil posted stats. You post the fbi website??? I am sure you realize that referencing the homepage of the fbi on a uni paper, would not suffice as an actual reference?

Since you keep saying that you merely wanted to discuss the issue, I don't understand why you are getting so upset about the fact that your theories do neither make sense, nor seem to be able to be supported by any published report.

As far as the immaturity issue, you might want to backtrack and see who was the first to start the silliness.

Unfortunately, all I have to do is turn on the news

If we all know that (generalizing again?), it must be true.


The cases they bring up yes. The definitions they give of child sexual abuse, how it happens, and who can a perpetrator be, etc, are very much general.


If you know the Ferns Report cases were all obviously men because they were priests, why generalize it?
And why bring down people giving you concrete examples that such a generalization is misguiding?


That's why if you scroll by a couple of pages you'll find posts of you, me and Russ dicussing it. (with you and me actually agreeing)

I just mentioned your generalization about how paedophiles are always old men was wrong, brought you some clear evidence, including a current fact, and you, the mature one, couldn't take it.
I never did that, nore any other post, for my ego, because I couldn't care less what people on a message board may think of me.
Such a generalization is misguiding (like the other one you almost did without meaning it about paedophiles going after boys only) and I don't like leaving what is misguiding undisputed.


Ponrauil

Glitter has applied for bail...... like if he gets it he wil remain there, he is going to disappear to Brazil or something, I hope he doesnt get it.

Dawn