Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iceman
Yeah, Wikipedia is a wikisite, but it's not just a wiki. And it's one of the most accurate and up to date encyclopedias you'll ever find.
|
Doesn’t mean that it’s reliable, anyone can go in there and change information a as they please. As a matter of fact I never use internet (I do use Nationalencyklopedins webpage, but that’s just because there are soooo many books!) when I do research for any of my assignments at the uni, just because allot of the information from the internet is many times never “verified”.
This of course means that I won’t always have the most up dated information, but at least I know that it’s correct.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iceman
Why are they harmful if they use wood? Woodpeckers destroy wood also, are they harmful?
Wasps may be annoying, but they're necessary for the nature to function. Mosqitos on the other hand...
Ice
|
The Acanthocinus aedilis ( I don’t know the English word) and the Camponotus herculaneus (the same) are also classified as harmful animals due to the fact that eat wood, if they get in to your house, they house will be very damaged. It’s the same thing with wasp’s, huge wasp nests are a problem in house made of wood.
I won’t believe that Wasps are necessary in nature on the fact that the keep the harmful insects at a low level, unless you give me a real source. Wasp for sure does it, but that doesn’t mean that they are needed, mosquitos are food for birds, but they aren’t necessary either.
Perhaps wasps are necessary, perhaps not. either way, a wiki isn't a reliable source.