yeah it woulda been brilliant if he done paul ferris' or someone who owned one of the clubs up there.

As for the original comment. I used to think a Pollock was just random paint threw onto a canvas (which in a way it is) but after a bit of observation it turns into more. It's basically a "history" of what he done when he was painting it.

It's not some landscape or portrait you can pretty much see how he made it, what colours flow over the top of each other, how intense of laid back he was when doing it....

I'm no art afficiando by any stretch of the imagination but i can appreciate a good piece when i come across it (even some modern art)