What is this exactly? He didn't share his bed, more lent it, i.e he wasn't in it with them! Also, don't you think the question mark should lie more over the heads of the parents who allow their children to sleep in Michaels bed, rather than him. Surely, if they're responable, they should take controle of the situation. They must feel their children are safe, and be fully awear of what is happening.

I"m guessing the reason non of his family have helped is because they hate each other. If not hate, they certainly don't have a normal relationship.... I pretty sure the sisters don't like him, and I got the feeling that he wasn't at all close with his brothers.

If it was a non-celebrity doing this in Britain, not only would they have no charges brough against them, but their actions would probably result in them recieving numberous benefits.... Is dangling a child out of balcony (whilst keeping a pretty good grip, and doing it for only a few seconds), any worse than driving a car, with a child in, who isn't wearing a seatbelt? I'd argue that when Michael held his child out of the window, he was in controle, if you're in a car, you're not in controle, and it's therfore more dangerous to drive without making sure you're doing everythign you can to ensure your childs safety...... But if we locked away everybody who drove a car without making their children wear seat belts, we'd have more people in jail than out of jail!