Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

N Korea test Nuke

NBJ - Everything Else


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 10-12-2006, 01:29 AM
gazthomas gazthomas is offline
Troublemaker
The Distance
 
Join Date: 17 Jul 2004
Location: Troublemakerland - honest!
Age: 32
Gender: male
Posts: 8,445
Default

just watched the hills have eyes

that may happen lol
Reply With Quote

  #42  
Old 10-12-2006, 01:35 AM
pwnedshot117's Avatar
pwnedshot117 pwnedshot117 is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 03 Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Age: 34
Gender: male
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazthomas
just watched the hills have eyes

that may happen lol
Let's hope not, because then they'd want to make a sequel or knock off to that piece of crap.
__________________
.wav/.flac lossless > SoundBlaster XtremeMusic > Harman-Kardon AVR 247 > Orb Audio Mod2 7.1 Dual Subs

I finally found my way...
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-12-2006, 02:06 AM
{_Warrior_}'s Avatar
{_Warrior_} {_Warrior_} is offline
I Wanna Rock
Jovi Freak
 
Join Date: 31 Jul 2002
Location: BRAZIL
Age: 35
Gender: male
Posts: 3,264
Send a message via MSN to {_Warrior_}
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
Please quote me where I said the Japanese are animals. Go ahead, I'm waiting. Oh that's right, I never said anything like that. I guess you're so brainwashed you can't fathom that invading Japan by land WOULD HAVE KILLED MORE civilians than dropping the bomb, not to mention the millions of Japanese and American serviceman. You're just another one of the countless tools I've shot down saying that.
You haven't say that, I did it. Based on this ironic statement: "They should have just invaded Japan by land, which would have cost millions of lives".
Here I consider that you give more value to an american soldier than to a japanese civil. That's my opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
Wait, you're from Brazil, and just said you know there are a lot of people in the US that disagree with me. Wow, how about you come live here for 19 years and THEN you can talk.
No thanks, I don't need to live there to know this things.
__________________
"I continuously go further and further learning about my own limitations, my body limitation, psychological limitations. It's a way of life for me." (Senna, Ayrton)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-12-2006, 02:19 AM
pwnedshot117's Avatar
pwnedshot117 pwnedshot117 is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 03 Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Age: 34
Gender: male
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by {_Warrior_}
You haven't say that, I did it. Based on this ironic statement: "They should have just invaded Japan by land, which would have cost millions of lives".
Here I consider that you give more value to an american soldier than to a japanese civil. That's my opinion.
Should I give more value to an American soldier than a Japanese civilian? Dang right, I should. Fellow countryman first, all others second in the case of war. Either way, you must HAVE COMPLETELY MISSED the point that MORE japanese civilians would have died as a result of a land invasion than those that were killed by the two nukes. That's just common sense, and you keep ignoring it. Why? Is it because you didn't catch the sarcasm in what you just quoted me saying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by {_Warrior_}
No thanks, I don't need to live there to know this things.
Brazil is full of a bunch of know it all's who hate America because their media has brainwashed them that way. I don't need to live there to know these things.

Can you see your own ignorance yet? It's literally smacking you in the face.
__________________
.wav/.flac lossless > SoundBlaster XtremeMusic > Harman-Kardon AVR 247 > Orb Audio Mod2 7.1 Dual Subs

I finally found my way...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-12-2006, 04:08 AM
ponrauil's Avatar
ponrauil ponrauil is offline
Senior Member
It's my post
 
Join Date: 12 Oct 2003
Location: Nantes - France
Age: 44
Posts: 4,962
Send a message via MSN to ponrauil
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
HAHAHAHA, this thread reaks of ignorance and brainwashing. Remember those plans Bush made when he first got elected, you know the ones about giving more money to be people to boost the economy back up. If I'm not mistaken the DOW Jones just set record highs. How about this one: when Bush was re-elected in 2004 he planned to have the deficit to be cut in half by the time he left office. Well, as of yesterday that has already happened. Many other plans have worked successfully under Bush, contrary to what your media wants you to believe up north. The Iraq conflict was planned out for sometime, and the initial operation was a complete success with the ousting of Saddam's regime. The majority of causalties have been caused by rebels and terrorists.
And isn't it convenient how such figures pop-up weeks before an important election... Isn't it easy to make a pessimistic forecast to make reality sound better when it hits. Only a really messed up administration would take pride at a $286 billion deficit.

The "initial operation" in Iraq you call a success should have been, in a planned action, a first step and the next ones would have been thought through. They weren't and look in what shit the US army's in now.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
All in all, you fail with you're witty comment. Try again.
This isn't a smartass competition but a discussion, grow up.


Ponrauil
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-12-2006, 04:26 AM
{_Warrior_}'s Avatar
{_Warrior_} {_Warrior_} is offline
I Wanna Rock
Jovi Freak
 
Join Date: 31 Jul 2002
Location: BRAZIL
Age: 35
Gender: male
Posts: 3,264
Send a message via MSN to {_Warrior_}
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
Should I give more value to an American soldier than a Japanese civilian? Dang right, I should. Fellow countryman first, all others second in the case of war. Either way, you must HAVE COMPLETELY MISSED the point that MORE japanese civilians would have died as a result of a land invasion than those that were killed by the two nukes. That's just common sense, and you keep ignoring it. Why? Is it because you didn't catch the sarcasm in what you just quoted me saying?



Brazil is full of a bunch of know it all's who hate America because their media has brainwashed them that way. I don't need to live there to know these things.

Can you see your own ignorance yet? It's literally smacking you in the face.
You have your point, but I have mine and I will not change it, so my part in this dialogue discussion ends here.
__________________
"I continuously go further and further learning about my own limitations, my body limitation, psychological limitations. It's a way of life for me." (Senna, Ayrton)
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:14 AM
pwnedshot117's Avatar
pwnedshot117 pwnedshot117 is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 03 Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Age: 34
Gender: male
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponrauil
And isn't it convenient how such figures pop-up weeks before an important election... Isn't it easy to make a pessimistic forecast to make reality sound better when it hits. Only a really messed up administration would take pride at a $286 billion deficit.

The "initial operation" in Iraq you call a success should have been, in a planned action, a first step and the next ones would have been thought through. They weren't and look in what shit the US army's in now.
Actually, the deficit in terms of dollar value isn't very bad at all. Actually, it's only a little above average when compared to the percentage of GDP. It sure beats the years when we were in the Great Depression or WWII. The only reason the previous administration had a surplus is because we had the biggest economic growth in history AS A RESULT of conservative policies under Reagan and Bush Sr. A monkey could have been president during Clinton's term and the exact same things would have happened.

It is very convenient those numbers come up before November. Lower gas prices, deficit cut in half, economy is booming, etc. You know, maybe, just MAYBE, those numbers are a result of this administrations policies over the last few years that are finally starting to pay off post-recession.

The operation in Iraq was planned out well, but who could have expected thousands upon thousands of insurgents to fight back? It didn't happen that badly in Afghanistan, so why Iraq? Well now we know why. Again with that, hindsight is 20/20. Do you have a better solution? I didn't think so.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ponrauil
This isn't a smartass competition but a discussion, grow up.


Ponrauil
If I'm not mistaken, you started that competition, not me.
__________________
.wav/.flac lossless > SoundBlaster XtremeMusic > Harman-Kardon AVR 247 > Orb Audio Mod2 7.1 Dual Subs

I finally found my way...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:34 AM
ponrauil's Avatar
ponrauil ponrauil is offline
Senior Member
It's my post
 
Join Date: 12 Oct 2003
Location: Nantes - France
Age: 44
Posts: 4,962
Send a message via MSN to ponrauil
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
It is very convenient those numbers come up before November. Lower gas prices, deficit cut in half, economy is booming, etc. You know, maybe, just MAYBE, those numbers are a result of this administrations policies over the last few years that are finally starting to pay off post-recession.
Well you've shown own one sided you are. I'm ready to give the Reagan administration some credit, Bush Senior's too. But to say that an administration that kept it's place for 8 years had nothing to do with it's good results is just narrow minded. Believe what you want, I will too. And that is that THIS Bush administration is, and will have been, a disaster to the US and the world.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
The operation in Iraq was planned out well, but who could have expected thousands upon thousands of insurgents to fight back? It didn't happen that badly in Afghanistan, so why Iraq? Well now we know why. Again with that, hindsight is 20/20. Do you have a better solution? I didn't think so.
How about you wait for the answer?

1 - All the countries that opposed the war knew there would be insurgents, it was one of the main reasons they opposed it, especially France from it's own experience in Algeria.

2 - It is happening in Afghanistan too, especially in the South the Talibans are gaining ground, the situation is worsening everyday. Only it's Canadian soldiers (Canada is leading the NATO force there) dying so you're probably not hearing about it on Fox News.

3 - Yes I do have a better solution (well not me actually, but the 75% of the world that opposed the war as led by the US-UK coallition):

a-The military action should have been under the UN banner like in the 1st Gulf war and should have had arab countries supplying some soldiers. Countries like Marocco and Egypt were ready to do so at least in the rebuilding phase.
b-Any middle east expert will tell you that the extremists are all Wahabis, which actually represent a small and identified minority (but they have the money). They should have been the one and only target (and not only of military operations). Instead, everyone was bombed the same... so the anti-US feeling spread to all the population that otherwise would have offered the warm welcome expected.
c-Once the dictator is down, do not take more than a year to rebuild roads and airports, to set electricity back on, etc...

I could go on.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
If I'm not mistaken, you started that competition, not me.
No I just made a sarcastic comment, I didn't use the childish "You fail" "Try again" or "I win" crap, you did.

Ponrauil
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-12-2006, 06:14 AM
pwnedshot117's Avatar
pwnedshot117 pwnedshot117 is offline
Senior Member
Wanted Dead or Alive
 
Join Date: 03 Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Age: 34
Gender: male
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponrauil
Well you've shown own one sided you are. I'm ready to give the Reagan administration some credit, Bush Senior's too. But to say that an administration that kept it's place for 8 years had nothing to do with it's good results is just narrow minded. Believe what you want, I will too. And that is that THIS Bush administration is, and will have been, a disaster to the US and the world.
Prove them both. Prove that anything the Clinton admin did helped bolster the economy and that Bush is a disaster.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ponrauil
How about you wait for the answer?

1 - All the countries that opposed the war knew there would be insurgents, it was one of the main reasons they opposed it, especially France from it's own experience in Algeria. I didn't say there wouldn't be insurgents, I said we didn't think there would be that many.

2 - It is happening in Afghanistan too, especially in the South the Talibans are gaining ground, the situation is worsening everyday. Only it's Canadian soldiers (Canada is leading the NATO force there) dying so you're probably not hearing about it on Fox News. I don't watch Fox News, don't stereotype. You won't hear that on CNN either.

3 - Yes I do have a better solution (well not me actually, but the 75% of the world that opposed the war as led by the US-UK coallition):

a-The military action should have been under the UN banner like in the 1st Gulf war and should have had arab countries supplying some soldiers. Countries like Marocco and Egypt were ready to do so at least in the rebuilding phase. The UN is worthless for one. Two, they never would have allowed an invasion of Iraq. Moot point.
b-Any middle east expert will tell you that the extremists are all Wahabis, which actually represent a small and identified minority (but they have the money). They should have been the one and only target (and not only of military operations). Instead, everyone was bombed the same... so the anti-US feeling spread to all the population that otherwise would have offered the warm welcome expected. I don't think the intention was to "blow crap up," and more along the lines of take out infrastructure and resources. It's not like we were going after neighborhoods...
c-Once the dictator is down, do not take more than a year to rebuild roads and airports, to set electricity back on, etc...Not possible for a country that big without enough of our manpower to go around rebuilding.

I could go on.
Please do.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ponrauil
No I just made a sarcastic comment, I didn't use the childish "You fail" "Try again" or "I win" crap, you did. You fail was directed at the sarcasm. Try again is childish? I win? Where?

Ponrauil
__________________
.wav/.flac lossless > SoundBlaster XtremeMusic > Harman-Kardon AVR 247 > Orb Audio Mod2 7.1 Dual Subs

I finally found my way...

Last edited by pwnedshot117; 10-12-2006 at 06:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-12-2006, 07:03 AM
ponrauil's Avatar
ponrauil ponrauil is offline
Senior Member
It's my post
 
Join Date: 12 Oct 2003
Location: Nantes - France
Age: 44
Posts: 4,962
Send a message via MSN to ponrauil
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
Prove them both. Prove that anything the Clinton admin did helped bolster the economy and that Bush is a disaster.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
I didn't say there wouldn't be insurgents, I said we didn't think there would be that many.
It's not a secret insurgents can never be counted and never disappear until it's their interest to stop their violence. Another major mistake.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
I don't watch Fox News, don't stereotype. You won't hear that on CNN either.
You got the point...


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
The UN is worthless for one. Two, they never would have allowed an invasion of Iraq. Moot point.
The UN is worthless when any of the 5 members goes against the other 4.
The 5 worked together in 91, it worked within a couple of months.
The US went it's own way in 2003, we're still in it 4 years later.

Not that moot I say.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
I don't think the intention was to "blow crap up," and more along the lines of take out infrastructure and resources. It's not like we were going after neighborhoods...
Whatever the intention was, you don't fight terrorists like any army in any war. You fight it with intelligence and economic levers.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
Not possible for a country that big without enough of our manpower to go around rebuilding.
The rebuilding went at steady pace near the oil fields...


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
I could go on.
Please do.
I've backed up and explained my opinions enough. All you've done is go against them with one liners. How about you back up your own opinions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnedshot117
You fail was directed at the sarcasm. Try again is childish? I win? Where?
See? Childish again...

And if you want this discussion to go on, please use the quote function properly.


Ponrauil
__________________

Last edited by ponrauil; 10-12-2006 at 07:52 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.