Signature Size

I know I'm a person who has been against having large signatures, but now its gone too fcuking far. The limit is now 250 wide by 350 high, which is way too small.

Even on an 800 x 600 monitor a signature of 600 wide by 350 high is plenty small enough to not take up the screen.

my vote goes to whatever size my signature is (have no clue - nor do I care)

As long as I am ok, I don't give a crap

Seriously, what is the big deal? Obviously it is annoying if you have to scroll down a half page to get past the sig, but then, usually we don't have a problem with that. (unless somone wants to prove a point ------- well, even then, it'll go away eventually)



edit: ahhhh, I checked my size and voted. I voted for my size, but really I didn't mean that. Actually, I am for a "no size" limit. Cannot erase my vote. Sorry.

Their should be a limit but the new limit isnt letting me put the lovely new sig pic Neil made for me

For anyone else who has Sig pics - dont change them or else you wont be able to put one back in!!!!

go on other boards and you will see that this board has no problem whatsoever. signature sizes were fine before so it's your own fault for bitching.

Whatever Neil wants!!

Tash

No. I wanted a limit, but not so small. It is the fault of certain people recently who had 3 or 4 pictures in their signature...and each picture was a large one; meaning that it filled more than a full screen when reading topics.

Here are the sizes we are talking about:

600 x 350


450 x 250


250 x 350

The first one is way too big Neil!!!

Tash

actually I like the second one better than the third. Since it is shorter, it appears smaller and you don't need to "scroll" as much.

Mine is 300 x 205, so I wouldn't be able to post it again, though it seems much smaller than the third option.

Don't you think?

Don't like the 1st & 3rd ones.... an u post the current size?