so sad

Oh Wait. I didn't claim anything. I said it wouldn't surprise me. I meant that, due to the fact that Saddam has been just as cruel to his people in the past.

ugly... has a point actually

iraq are relying on a particular method of propaganda - and that is reality

it works for them to show the reality of war because at home it fuels anti-war sentiment - in doing so this is being very liberal with the press

whereas our tv networks censor this reality - they talk of troops paraded on tv but they do not show the coverage more than just clips

why do we want to see this? you ask...

well i don't personally but if we are truly democratic and liberal we should see it - and we don't seem to have problems showing the reality of war in other parts of the world

or just plain old reality of life

Oh, you mean this:

An investigative journalist and author of the recent article "The Saddam in Rumsfeld's Closet," Scahill said today: "Some of the very same government officials who are now advocating invasion of Iraq, citing its use of chemical weapons over a decade ago, were in fact cooperating with Iraq when it was actually using such weapons. For example, Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein in 1983 and again was in Baghdad in 1984 just after U.S. State Department reports of Iraq's use of chemical weapons surfaced. The purpose of his missions to Baghdad was not to get the Iraqis to stop using such weapons -- it was to forge closer ties."

My country is not run by a cruel ruthless pig!

Last I checked, no US President gas and tortured his own people??

USA is the only country that do this. It´s a good thing that. Europe would be NAZI if USA hadn´t go to France in the 40´s. It seems to me that we´re stupid. USA can do things right or wrong, but we should be more grateful.
Sadam is a dictator, has letal weapons, have killed many people, and he should be in the hell. He want to keep himself in Iraq forever and ever. War is war. People die. DEMAGOGY NOT.
I don´t want to write more.

Yes, I am glad I don't live in the US, lol.

Yes, but they only care about it when it suits them:

An investigative journalist and author of the recent article "The Saddam in Rumsfeld's Closet," Scahill said today: "Some of the very same government officials who are now advocating invasion of Iraq, citing its use of chemical weapons over a decade ago, were in fact cooperating with Iraq when it was actually using such weapons. For example, Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein in 1983 and again was in Baghdad in 1984 just after U.S. State Department reports of Iraq's use of chemical weapons surfaced. The purpose of his missions to Baghdad was not to get the Iraqis to stop using such weapons -- it was to forge closer ties."