Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community
Home Register Members FAQ
 

Why we should support the war.

NBJ - Everything Else


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 03-23-2003, 04:12 AM
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
PLAY KING OF THE MOUNTAIN...
I Don't Want To Post Forever
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Sheffield
Age: 38
Gender: male
Posts: 13,330
Default

Quote:
I do think we need America much more than America needs us. It's convinient for America to have Britain as a close allie, it's impretive Britain has America as a close allie.
thats why our marines etc are leading the American ones ey
Reply With Quote

  #32  
Old 03-23-2003, 04:46 AM
joviscout's Avatar
joviscout joviscout is offline
Senior Member
These Days
 
Join Date: 18 Dec 2002
Location: Fife SCOTLAND
Posts: 2,343
Send a message via ICQ to joviscout Send a message via MSN to joviscout
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McRock
Quote:
Originally Posted by joviscout
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Kid-A*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mousebounce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McRock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mousebounce
Quote:
I'm sorry, are we talking about the same war???? America is the agressor, as far as I'm concerned, the UN voted against it, and America shown their disreguard for the international communtiy by going agains this. America is effectively breaking a UN ruling, wait, isn't that why we're going to war, America is breaking a UN ruling to defend another one, yeah right! This won't deter anybody, it will just provoke terrorism, which is what we are being told is one of the issues the war is being faught over.

I guess England has nothing to do with this. I love how your focus is the USA.
I honestly don't think they do. Britain is sort of the puppy dog, trying to run along America's side, playing with the big boys. America said some time last week, that they would go to war with or without Britain's support. I may be wrong here, but if America had voted against a war in the UN, would we be at war now???? I'm guessing not.

I'm not saying Britain should be part of this war, I think they are as guilty as they are taking part. Britain in many way's politically has to go along with America, they're always seen as each other's biggest allies, and for Britain to break this, woudl be far to big of a risk. This is the reason I think it was passed through the HOC, and the reason that British public opinion has been disregaureded as it has.

The UK is as guilty for taking party, but I don't think they had anything to do with the desision to go to war. It may seem like they did, but at the end of the day, whatever Britain wanted, what ever Britain did, it wouldn't have had any bearing on the fact that we are now at war. However, I think America held all the cards, and ultimately make their desision in issolation, by saying they woudl do it with or without the support of the international communtiy.
And you know this because.....
How do you know that Tony Blair wasn't behind this??? The UK doesn't have to do anything it doesn't want to. You all say that Bush is so stupid and ignorant, so how do you know that we are not going along with the UK?
Why does the blame focus on us? That is racist and ignorance right there.

Plus, you have no proof to back that up. You are going with the stereotypical "USA is always the bad guy."
Apparently you didn't read Mike McRock's post closely enough, as it answers all your questions.

UK hasn't got the military power to do this alone. And US stated publically that it is ready to do it alone, so pleeeeeeaaaaaseee!
Come off it if the uk wanted to go it alone they would send the sas in and take out saddam and co that way.


If they could send in the **** sas to knock of Saddam then they would do!!!!!!!!! It would be much less costly than sending down thousands of men to face possiable chemical warefare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Plus, think about how bloody costly this thing is.... if it was that easy, then they would have done it several years ago!
They offerd in the last gulf war and got rejected and im sure they have done the same now. For all YOU know they could bein there right now you know nothing like the rest of us were little puppets being fed only what were wanted to know. So dont pretend like you know something cause you dont. And the sas could take out saddam in a heartbeat. They are the best unit in the would and that aint my opinion that is a fact.
__________________
Jesus said 'i am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the father but through me'

http://www.theforumplanet.com
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-23-2003, 04:58 AM
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
PLAY KING OF THE MOUNTAIN...
I Don't Want To Post Forever
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Sheffield
Age: 38
Gender: male
Posts: 13,330
Default

SAS been in there for a while now :} gathering recon for these precision bomb blasts
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-23-2003, 05:08 AM
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
PLAY KING OF THE MOUNTAIN...
I Don't Want To Post Forever
 
Join Date: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Sheffield
Age: 38
Gender: male
Posts: 13,330
Default

http://www.lasttrumpetministries.org...March2003.html

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-23-2003, 11:24 AM
Mike McRock's Avatar
Mike McRock Mike McRock is offline
Senior Member
Jovi Freak
 
Join Date: 13 Jan 2003
Location: Standing on the Rock
Posts: 3,612
Send a message via MSN to Mike McRock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joviscout

They offerd in the last gulf war and got rejected and im sure they have done the same now. For all YOU know they could bein there right now you know nothing like the rest of us were little puppets being fed only what were wanted to know. So dont pretend like you know something cause you dont. And the sas could take out saddam in a heartbeat. They are the best unit in the would and that aint my opinion that is a fact.
Yes, the SAS phone Bush up and say, 'we can have the war over in a week, without having a single soldier fired out, without a single bomb being fired'. Why would they say no.....

We are being fed what they want us to know, this is the same with all wars, but you can still largely read though it, and speculate as to what is really going on.

I don't know anything, you don't know anything. The fact is though, I'm not somebody who accepts everything I'm told, and I do actually think about these things, and try to grasp what is happening. Everythign is an assesement, but having listened to the reasons going into war, I've come to my own conclutions, as have a lot of people, from that. I'm willing to stress my views, although there are only a handfull of people who know really why we are fighting.

What I'm saying is common scence, and logic. It may not be true, but anything else just woudn't add up.
THis is a quick war, or at least America, and Britian want it to be as quick as possiable. The target for the war is Saddam, and his regime. And with public suport how it is, a lenghty war, including the use of chemical weapons wouldnt' be able to be sustained under such low morral. If they could end it straight away, they would. What do you think that first attack was about? (maybe propaganda, but most likely it was an attempt on Saddam)..

Nobody knows exacty what is happening, but you have to use your knowlege of the situation, and understanding of how governments and politics at times like this work to be able to come to some conclution....

Quote:
They are the best unit in the would and that aint my opinion that is a fact.
nope, that's your opinion. I'm not saying I don't agree, I can't really comment, but it's still only an opinion.
__________________
Marge: start a security company
Homer: Wuh! Finaly a way to combine my love of helping people, with my love of hurting people.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.