What Are You Listening To?

Whistle For The Choir - The Fratellis

No One Knows - Queens Of The Stone Age

Angel Eyes - Wet Wet Wet

Torn - Creed

Maybe they were into sex, drugs and rock and roll, but the music just doesn't go with that. Having sex with random girls and doing drugs and then grabbing your acoustic guitars and singing Wonderwalls just don't go. That's what I like about Motley Crue, they've got the attitude and the ballsy music to go with it.

Now, Oasis are little pussysucking weak mother****ers. Let's take the situation that happened a little while ago, one of them got attacked on stage. And then we see the other brother going to attack the attacker. Pretty tough, throwing a punch at someone.

Actually no. Because that whiny little git doesn't even DARE to attempt to throw a punch at the guy until the security guards have got him, if that guy wasn't strained no way would the brother have attemped to punch him, no way.

Whereas Vince Neil actually killed someone. Ok, that's nothing to be proud of so I'll move onto the next instance. Vince Neil vs Axl Rose. We all know how ****ing crazy Axl Rose is but he's a scared lil pussysucking mother****er as well, he knows Vince Neil wouldn't dare hold back and will brutally beat Axl Rose, hence why Axl hasn't come to find Vince yet - even though he started the fight. So we all know our little Vince Neil doesn't need anyone to hold someone back whilst he beats them up.

Also, in the 80's Motley Crue had to cancel gigs due to all the drugs, violence, band members and tour crews walking out and Nikki Sixx like dying. Oasis cancelled a few gigs last week because one of them got pushed over.

And one more thing on that whole incident. Robbie Williams once famously got pushed on stage - yeah that's right, the guy you were dissing earlier was pushed on stage JUST LIKE OASIS.

Motley Crue once did an awful cover of The Beatles, but at least they're not trying to be The Beatles and utterly failing at it.

Oasis are known for being arrogant, self-obsessive, mother****ers. They have to tell themselves that their songs are the best because no one else will. Motley Crue on the other hand know if they've made a bad album and will fully admit it - like the self-titled 1994 album.

You said no one wanted Motley Crue after the 80's. Of course not, Nikki Sixx sold them out and did a grunge album and Motley Crue just aren't grunge. But Nikki Sixx knows it was a stupid thing to do and now they are back to how they were and are still having success.

Mean while Oasis have become their own tribute band. That's a quote from someone, can't remember who but it's true

That's all I can be bothered to do at the moment.

VERDICT:

Motley Crue: The Live Wires should carry on for eternity.

Oasis: Stop the cocks.

Let it Die- Foo Fighters

That's a particularly ignorant thing to say. Wonderwall is one of a ****ing kind, there are no songs like it on the first three albums (maybe Cast No Shadow, which is a far better song anyway). With the exception of Married With Children (which is mostly acoustic and is a piss-take anyway) every song on the first album is full of overdriven guitars, loud drums, and proper rock vocals, not some shitty chipmunk. The second album is lighter, as is everything since, with the exception of their latest, but it's moronic to steriotype them by one song...at least I've had the displeasure of hearing two Motley Crue records.

If you watch the video it's pretty obvious that Liam had no idea what was happening (he doesn't jump about like an idiot when he sings, so he wasn't looking that way) until the guy RAN TOWARDS HIM TO DO THE SAME. In the end he didn't even punch him.

I can't be arsed to go on defending Axl Rose, but he's been in (and won) a fair few fights in his time. And Vince Neil killed someone? Give him a ****ing medal!

After he was pushed over Noel Gallagher fell on the amps and broke a few of his ribs. He couldn't exactly carry on touring, doctor's orders. And they only cancelled one gig, all the rest have been rescheduled, minus the Eden Project gig, which will be.

Is that Oasis' fault? :S

Helter Skelter, right? Oasis did a shit cover of that too. But their version of I Am The Walrus is brilliant. And yeah, they love the Beatles, but contarary to what people enjoy saying about them (the press steriotype) they have never actually tried. I'm sure if you made a band it would sound a bit like Bon Jovi and Motley Crue, right?

Another example of you showing you know nothing about what you're talking about. After Be Here Now was released in 1997, Noel Gallagher, who wrote every single song on the album (as with the first two, no other members, no co-writers...when did Nikki Sixx do that?) was calling songs on it "****ing shit", calling the production "bland" and saying that it was recorded in such a haze of cocaine (there's drugs again, Oli!) that the results were shit.

True.

Every tour Oasis play 6-8 songs off their new album, I'm sure they'd play more if they could actually be arsed to change the setlist. But, then again, I'm sure Motley Crue aren't the kings of setlist variety either. Their new album is basically a whole new sound, though in a way it still sounds like Oasis...it's different. I think it's their best album since 1995. There's no way they've become their own tribute act. I'm not just saying this, but that would be a far more accurate description of The Crue.

REAL VERDICT:

Motley Crue: Washed up hair metal shit that nobody takes seriously. More famous for their reputation than for their music.

Oasis: Proper, influential rock 'n' roll band. Classic songs and classic albums go hand in hand with Oasis.

Dude, you listen to Oasis.

Jesus ****ing Christ. Why do so many people get so worked-up over Oasis on here?

Anyway...

The Boss - Streets of Philadelphia. <3 Now THAT'S a beautiful/amazing song.

^ - Brilliant Disguise. Love it!