I can promise you that if anyone goes out and shave their head, take drugs, and esp. party with Paris Hilton because that's what Britney did, they're already not right in the head. Just like the millions of people we hear about everyday that lock their girlfriends in their boots, and drive off a bridge because that's what Eminem does in one of his songs, right? -_^ Britney, along with any other celebrity, is not resposible for children's actions. They are not here to help you raise your children...that's the parent's jobs. And you get to chose (up until a certain age) who and what they are exposed to. And you have the amazing ability to communicate with them and tell them what is right and wrong. Britney isn't going to make them go out and do those things unless they're already disturbed in the first place.

Or is it because she shows her flesh and is in touch with her sexuality? Is she not meant to wear whatever she wants? Is she meant to just be "good" for the sake of the world's children. Oh please. As already stated what about these rockstar's? You know, the drug taking, screwing all these women, walking around stage wiht no shirt on, etc. But they're allowed to because they're male, right? It's double standards. If I go out tonight and screw 2 men I'll be branded a slut. Or if I even maybe showed some flesh some people would probably brand me a slut. But some man go out there and do the same thing and they're "cool" and "big" and it's all a big joke. **** that.

Britney really is not the worst role model a girl can have, lol.