Originally Posted by semigoodlookin (Post 1151046)

I am not sure what's worse. Over analyzing a situation in a thread dedicated to that situation or amassing over one hundred posts in that thread telling people how sad the over analyzing is. In fact I do know what's worse.

That Jessy guy is obviously invested in the situation and is talking about it, some of it is boring to me so I don't read it, other things are worth a look. Why does it offend some people that others are interested in this?

As it seems standard to judge people's contribution, I have made 60+ posts, so I guess that makes me even less interested than the ones who say they aren't interested but have posted loads in this thread.

Originally Posted by rino (Post 1151001)

I have the most respect for Tico,he had problems to in the past and look where the man is now. He's still playing with a passion beyond believe at that age. So ,Jon and Richie, give the fans what they deserve. And what Phil concerns: They are two total different players,but BJ doesn't sounds like BJ with Phil on guitar,you have to agree with that.I think,the most important question is: what will happen after the tour?????? I don't think Phil will stay on,so they are a short of a guitarplayer,anyone interested??;);)

We all know what happend with Guns n roses when Slash left,downhill sins!!!

Originally Posted by jessycardy (Post 1151031)

For whoever might be interested. It's easy, really. I keep reading time and time again about how it's boring to read certain posts or how some posts are okay while others are not or how we shouldn't care... The thing is simple: this is a thread about Richie not being on tour and all the drama that goes along with it. People here will post about Richie not being on tour and all the drama that goes along with it. Some people will judge others for their unfounded theories full of "over-analyzing", yet here I am posting simple facts (trivial or not, important or not, it's up to the reader, but still relevant) providing links to sources and I'm criticized anyway (and I'm not sure I understand why, by the way).

Originally Posted by jessycardy (Post 1151074)

I've read on the web that Richie denied the split on the "Daily Mirror", but some people and websites never cite sources to save their lives, and I can't seem to find anything. Are they just mixing up new and old interviews or did Richie really speak out?

Originally Posted by jessycardy (Post 1151074)

I've read on the web that Richie denied the split on the "Daily Mirror", but some people and websites never cite sources to save their lives, and I can't seem to find anything. Are they just mixing up new and old interviews or did Richie really speak out?

Originally Posted by dianeee (Post 1151076)

I realize on this board that if you are not a known or frequent poster, that questions and comments get passed right over and just generally ignored, but that was a serious question, and not meant in any way to stir things up, I was just wondering if you were male or female?