Supersonic |
08-30-2019 10:30 PM |
Aloha !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphavictim
(Post 1258656)
1. Guns & Roses were always a much COOLER band than Bon Jovi. The guitar playing kids (or even those who did not but liked rock guitar) still looked up to Slash when he started his solo career; Bon Jovi were soccer mom music more than anything.
2. Slash did a ton of features with high profile artists over the years, as early as when G&R still had that 5 year run atop of the world. He made a name for HIMSELF early on.
3. Bon Jovi are not a band of 5 super distinguishable individuals. The magic of original Guns & Roses were 5 guys. Now, the "reunion" is down to three. Still, who outside of fan circles knows the name of Bon Jovi's bass player? Duff, on the other hand, had posters of his own.
In terms of career perspective, Richie is probably closer to Richie Kotzen.
|
I agree very much with your statement in regards to Slash being iconic, but like you said, Slash has always done a lot of side projects. It's been 7 years since he's left Bon Jovi and he's not done much in regards to that. I don't think he was asked as much as Slash was but when he left Bon Jovi the general consensus among hard rock fans was "the only good thing in Bon Jovi left". He could've easily tapped into that and do loads and loads of guest performances in lots of relatively unknown bands. For whatever reason, Richie hasn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinny
(Post 1258663)
I think if Richie put together a supergroup of some sorts it might be a bit different...
|
Yeah, hence me saying he ought to figure out what he is instead of trying to pretend he's a front man. He just isn't. He's capable of leading a band but he's no front man. Like you said, if he'd have teamed up with another big name he'd have been able to sell tickets. Joe Perry did the same with Hollywood Vampires and its worked wonders for him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinny
(Post 1258663)
I presume we are talking about Europe here? In the states Aerosmith and Def Leppard were huge concert draws and just as popular as Jovi in their day. One of the problems with Bon Jovi is the band name. A certain amount of people always thought it was just Jon and nowadays it pretty much is.
|
I was talking about Europe yeah, but unlike what a lot of people seem to think Aerosmith have never been as big in America as Bon Jovi have been. Especially the last 20 or so years they've mostly been playing the same kind of venues Bon Jovi did in the mid-nineties due to a lack of new material, cancelled shows and fights in the band. It's no wonder really why people won't pay attention to Joe Perry. They don't really like it when he sings in Aerosmith shows, let alone doing solo gigs.
But yeah, the band name hasn't helped much. Also, Richie not showing up for promo work anymore due to disinterest in the material ultimately put him off the radar as well. Until 2003 he showed up for close to everything whereas after Have A Nice Day it's been mostly Jon. There's a lot of factors why his career won't take off, but mostly it's the lack of material and not willing to invest in his career. By now he's cancelled more shows in America than he's played there and unless he's going to visit these radio stations to do promo for his material that's just not going to change.
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
|