Beaky |
03-01-2014 08:07 AM |
The tour should never have started, with or without him.
This just shows what everyone has been thinking for a while - that a slice of the reason he couldn't be out on the road for a year was being around Jon.
I can't believe we're all still picking over this. Jon is a man with a vision - that vision, over the past thirty years has served him and the band every well. Like every good CEO, he assembles people under him who do good work. If they don't pull in the same direction, they are out the door (Doc, Alec).
I think Richie looked up one day and he was being treated like a hired hand for a band he wrote a shit load of material for. This pissed him off. He should have said outright - 'No, we ain't touring,' but I firmly believe he knew Jon would go without him, so he did it. But between the obvious bitterness and then having a week break with his daughter, he thought 'Life's too short for this - he can replace me, so let's see how he gets on.'
How did they get on? That's up to us as individuals to decide. Personally, I think Bon Jovi were way under par in 2013 but lots of fans didn't care if Richie was there or not because for them, the band is about Jon and whoever is close to him - hence the massive Phil love-ins and Matt stalkers on Twitter.
Then those people come on here and bitch about Richie. Who gives a f**k? You didn't care anyway.
It happened. It's done. Richie is now out there making music, getting better at every gig and if Jon ever manages to sort his vocals out and do the same I'll be happy. These guys make shitty music together right now. They BOTH dealt with this like passive aggressive kids and should have sat in a room and had it out in 2012.
So I prefer them on their own for the moment - rather than further sullying the legacy of this once great band.
|