Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community

Jovitalk - Bon Jovi Fan Community (https://drycounty.com/jovitalk/index.php)
-   Tour Discussion (https://drycounty.com/jovitalk/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   No Richie on current leg of the tour (https://drycounty.com/jovitalk/showthread.php?t=55338)

SadieLady 06-25-2014 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackieBlue (Post 1179039)
Any number of things could have happened. But at least we know now that it was never as simple as "Richie should have said that he didn't want to tour (or do a new album/tour) before the tour/album ever started." Apparently the decision he faced wasn't whether he wanted to tour or not, but whether he wanted to stay in Bon Jovi or not.

His statement in this article also leads me to believe that when he said that Mick wouldn't tour without Keith he wasn't referring, as some have suggested, to the idea that Jon should have stopped the tour when Richie walked away; but rather that Mick, in Jon's shoes, wouldn't have said (before the tour was arranged), "The band is going on tour with you or without you. You're either a part of that band or you're not."

Good points to make.

Walleris 06-25-2014 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackieBlue (Post 1179039)
Any number of things could have happened. But at least we know now that it was never as simple as "Richie should have said that he didn't want to tour (or do a new album/tour) before the tour/album ever started." Apparently the decision he faced wasn't whether he wanted to tour or not, but whether he wanted to stay in Bon Jovi or not.

I see where you're comming from, but that still doesn't add up to me. Then why Richie hasn't officially left the band? If these were the choices, then he clearly left the band for good. Whereas know he's officially still a member, just on not "on tour".

I mean, if you're Bon Jovi and you have indeed forced Richie out of the band, but still have plans to continue without him, wouldn't it make sense to officially announce he's left (and maybe replace him with Phil or just make a "vacant" spot like Alec). I think that would've hurt that short-term, but would've sent a stronger message long-term, if that indeed was the plan.

JackieBlue 06-25-2014 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walleris (Post 1179047)
I see where you're comming from, but that still doesn't add up to me. Then why Richie hasn't officially left the band? If these were the choices, then he clearly left the band for good. Whereas know he's officially still a member, just on not "on tour".

I mean, if you're Bon Jovi and you have indeed forced Richie out of the band, but still have plans to continue without him, wouldn't it make sense to officially announce he's left (and maybe replace him with Phil or just make a "vacant" spot like Alec). I think that would've hurt that short-term, but would've sent a stronger message long-term, if that indeed was the plan.

My guess would be the legal/financial ramifications would dictate whether they actually make an official change in status for Richie. It may be a situation similar to the dissolution of a high profile wealthy marriage where it benefits both parties more if they maintain a marriage in name only to protect their assets and reputation. (And I'll freely admit to talking out of my ass here because I don't have a clue how any of that works. Those are just my initial thoughts. It could be that if no one is sure where the band goes fom here, they may be trying to protect the legacy.)


I wasn't following the band when Alec and Bon Jovi parted company (regardless of how or why it happened) but the more I read about that
situation in old articles/interviews the more it bears a striking resemblance to what is happening now with Richie. Jon uses almost identical phrases in some cases.

JoviJovi 06-25-2014 05:58 AM

Shocking! Something Richie said in an interview over a year later conveniently sheds a whole new light on the situation and (gasp!) it makes Richie come out smelling like roses (if you twist and contort it to fit your theory of when it all actually went down, IF it all actually went down at all). This is what? The 4th, 5th, maybe 6th reason/excuse he has given? Please, next week it will be something else.

JackieBlue 06-25-2014 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoviJovi (Post 1179050)
Shocking! Something Richie said in an interview over a year later conveniently sheds a whole new light on the situation and (gasp!) it makes Richie come out smelling like roses (if you twist and contort it to fit your theory of when it all actually went down, IF it all actually went down at all). This is what? The 4th, 5th, maybe 6th reason/excuse he has given? Please, next week it will be something else.

Actually, I think it was the FIRST reason he alluded to, both in general ("personal reasons") and specifically ("Jon and I just aren't happening right now... Y'know it's family business, and the band's like family. Family business stays in the family"). That's probably not an exact quote but it's close enough for government work.

But I'm not sure what you think was twisted and contorted?

powernoize 06-28-2014 06:12 AM



Javier 06-28-2014 07:38 AM

Richie's voice sounded tired but also good if that makes any sense. I really liked that performance! Orianthi also has a good voice, what bugged me is that not even in that small acoustic setting could we be spared the pointing as in "go ahead, your turn now" thing he's doing lately!! :lol: It's almost turning into a parody lol

JackieBlue 07-03-2014 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Becky (Post 1179712)
Not that I've seen either. I find it highly doubtful that Jon has a a writer of Forbes magazine or any of the other news agencies that pick up the stories on his payroll. It's simply good journalism to report that the tour did well without Sambora. The expectation was that the tour would be plagued with problems because he left, but it wasn't at all. The only real problems were related to Tico's organs deciding they wanted out. Obviously, if you were writing about the BWC tour being the #1 tour in the world, you would put in the article that it was done without Richie there. That's part of the story. It's not a personal dig at Richie by Jon. I swear some people think Jon has way more power than he does. :rolleyes:

I don't know how much power Jon has but I'm pretty sure that he has connections out the ying yang. And somebody went to the trouble to filter through the Forbes list to find out what Bon Jovi had that wasn't already represented among the first 12 names so Bon Jovi would be the top "something" and fed that to ABC, along with the requisite "even without Sambora" statement. They did the same thing for tbe Rock Rich list and said Jovi topped the list again when there wasn't even a list prior to that.

I wasn't picking on Jon or saying he's evil. I was just pointing out that they're both getting in their digs just like they did while the tour was still going on. And it's okay that he's not perfect. Really, the world won't end because the man's human.

Jon doesn't need a writer at every news outlet to pick up stories. That what he pays a PR staff for. And if you think Jon doesn't have a highly paid and very competent staff who does exactly that kind of thing and then feeds it to the Forbes, the Billboards, and other "random" outlets, you're more naive that I thought you were.

These weren't stories about a #1 BWC tour. They were stories about the other successful artists from this year and howJovi had fallen from 7th to 13th. Pretty sure ABC didn't jump all over that as a top news story without a nudge from somebody. The BWC tour ended over 6 months ago. The only people who are still talking about it are deranged fans like us. Nobody else gives a rip.

Check out the timing on these little 'non-news' news blurbs and compare them to what's going on with Richie at the time. There's a pattern.

And then, maybe I'm wrong. It's been known to happen. ;)

At any rate, this thread isn't about "Evil Richie vs St. Jon" or "Why is Jon such a jerk when Richie's such a good guy?" Somebody just said they didn't like the way Richie digs at Jon (and I don't either, btw) and all I was saying is he's not the only one who's doing it. Jon, as always, is more subtle when he sticks the knife in. But you can bet that Richie's getting his message, too.

Becky 07-03-2014 02:37 AM

Sorry, Jackie, but I really think you're smoking something on this latest "belief" you have about Jon. You seem to want to believe the absolute worst about him in every situation, so I guess your latest "theory" shouldn't surprise anyone.

Whatever. Smoke another one. LOL

Walleris 07-03-2014 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackieBlue (Post 1179719)
...Somebody just said they didn't like the way Richie digs at Jon (and I don't either, btw) and all I was saying is he's not the only one who's doing it. Jon, as always, is more subtle when he sticks the knife in. But you can bet that Richie's getting his message, too.

You do realize that you're making an analogy of your own conspiracy (Jon's hired PR people bribing Forbes, Billboard and other outlets) vs. the words that came directly from Richie's mouth during interviews?


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.