Quote:
Richie won't have spoken to the journalist twice; the PR guy has probably worded it for Richie, gotten his approval and sold a transcript exclusively to the one outlet. That outlet will work out whether it worth breaking transcript up and drip-feeding it. They'll see how many hits they are getting from Richie-related stuff, it's their business to know how much social media noise there is around this at the moment. Then they'll check the band's schedule etc... The fact that the UK tour is coming up, the fact that the band are about to break for 10 days and people will be sniffing around for news, they can then make it look like they're in constant contact with Richie, they are THE place to go for updates. When, in truth, it's not an update, it's just part of the original transcript. |
this is what the Mail and Mail on Sunday is like. Thought about this last night when listening to the discussing a much more serious situation than Bonjovi's................Nick Ross's comments for those who know what I am talking about and so many people were ringing/tweeting/texting about how bad these papers are at sensationalism, misquoting, feeding teh quote to the person and blatant making things up.
|
Quote:
Believe me, as a previous employee of the Daily Mail ... after the Leveson Inquiry there is no desire to make such tabloid entertainment fodder up. Bon Jovi have millions of pounds to use to easily take the paper to court if it's made up. It would be an open and shut case. If it was reported speech or from "a source", then that might be a theory. But direct quotes? Not happening. And as for Nick Ross - he's said what was printed was a fair reflection. This is the Daily Mail remember - not Heat or Perez Hilton. They might like to make spurious links to terrorists, immigrants etc, but making up Celebrity news is not their thing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
Anyway, they might not be making it up (and I think I believe it, for Richie didn't rectify it), but they surely seem to have a lot of interest in the story for some reason. And I still believe the fact that we apparently have two "exclusives" about the Hyde Park comeback doesn't add up. |
Quote:
I think Richie said the Hyde Park quote... I think this is his way of putting the pressure back on Jon. 'I'm ready to come back for this gig... up to you now,' basically. |
The wanting to play hyde park isn't a new statement, he said it in the Sun article on May 24. I am surprised people are acting like its new information.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...and-drugs.html |
Quote:
What I don't understand about Hyde Park is it's either a MailOnline's exclusive or The Sun's. I don't see how it could be both. There's something off here. I'm not sure whether to believe this line or not, though, I don't think Richie would go to the extent of specifically coming up with a date for his return when, in his own words, "nothing is resolved" yet. It sounds weird to me. Then again, it ALL sounds weird if you ask me. |
Uhmmm you better come back to the start of the next leg Richie and not for Hyde park like the first show to come back.. Wanna see him in Madrid:(
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.