Quote:
|
Quote:
They were really unlucky with Always in the UK as Wet Wet Wet kept them off the top for 8 weeks and Always went from 4 to 3 to 2 to 3 to 2 and went on like that for weeks. Then Wet Wet Wet pulled their single and just when you thought Always would hit No 1 = Whigfields Saturday night entered at No 1 and Always slipped down the charts. I still think Whigfields song was fixed to go to no 1. But thats probably me being bitter. Sent from my SM-X700 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.discogs.com/de/release/2...U6Mzc5NTI1Ng== Printed in Holland, I don't think it was for US or Japanese markets. And they did promo here in Germany where it was announced as their new single. Don't think it would've been done if it wasn't on the market at the time: |
We definitely didn't get Only Lonely in the UK. In & Out was the first single, followed by Hardest Part. But looking at Discogs you could be right. I can't see a Euro release for In & Out, only UK/US/Jap/Canada, so it looks like you guys got Only Lonely instead! I always thought In & Out was a single everywhere! You learn something new every day!
|
We talked a lot about Jon's voice, but we didn't talk what would have happened if Jon hadn't had vocal cords problems...
In your opinion if Jon hadn't had vocal cord problems, nowdays he would still have had a voice at least similar he had in the HAND tour? (Ok his voice it's slightly changed even in the previous Era), but since early 00's it's changed a lot time his voice while he sang even between one year and another. Idk if his vocal cords problems are really started in that time(i would say yes, but...). I only say that seems that Jon also tried to change his technique of singing various times to move forward since then. There was one period that he sang during the new single's promotion in different way than the tour but he was really good the same:D; Now he did the chirurgical intervent and i hope it will be usefull for him to get a little improvement...(after whatched the Musicares event i say yes he did, but we should wait to see him in one long concert). |
Quote:
I also think he didn't really think about that so much in the 90s which would why he would often go for it during a full show, but I guess when you are younger you have more stamina. |
Quote:
Yes, i know that in that time he sang in different way during HAND tour than the tv promotions also to preserve his voice for the whole show, but since the LH era he sang during the tv promotions shows almost in the same way than he did in the tours(sometimes he was better in tours, he did some great performance during LH, TC tours ecc...). In the HAND era there was a bigger difference between him in tour and him during the tv promotions... |
Quote:
|
I think if he didn’t have vocal cord problems his voice would probably be reminiscent of 2008-2011, but more aged. I think he would’ve stuck to the technical approaches he switched to around the LH era as they expanded his range from what he was working with in the early-mid 2000s and are overall more sustainable and healthy for the voice. Even without vocal cord problems aging still affects the voice, so I don’t think his voice would still be the same now as it was in his early-mid 40s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I think without the vocal cord issues, Jon would be in late-2013/2014 KOS level vocally.
I really think his decline in 2013 is more due to strain and stress than physical problems. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My own opinion, I think his vocal injury has been there since 2002-2003. There is a huge change in his pronunciation and tone between crush and bounce tours. I think the 10 year comment by Jon is potentially talking about it being a real struggle/impossible to overcome.
Remember crush tour, Jon was doing some of the best vocal performances of songs in his career, eg I Believe. Then during the bounce tour, he could barely perform These Days/Always. Bare in mind these are very vocally challenging songs, but so is I Believe. If this is the case, I wonder how Jon would sound if his voice just aged? |
Aloha !
Quote:
Jon's voice has always been in decline. With the exception of the Lost Highway and The Circle Tours, every subsequent tour had worse vocals than the previous tour. It's only when his mid-register took a hit that it became obvious to the majority. Salaam Aleikum, Sebastiaan |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
IMO JBJ's vocal peak was the Cross Road era. On the TD tour, he sounded slightly worse than before (wasn't it around this time that he started smoking too?), and for Destination Anywhere, he even sorta admitted as much and went for a vocal range that better fit his natural range.
That didn't quite work, so back to the stratosphere again for Crush it was. He sounded slightly worse yet again, although still powerful, still singing outside his comfortable reach. But he had hits! Everybody on this board complained about how terrible his voice had gotten at that point; or at the very latest, did so during the Bounce tour. |
Using this thread...
I realized that the only copy of KTF I have is a super beat up second hand copy of the European release (so including Save A Prayer). I know that my dad has a weird white tray faux 2CD-version (regular one CD version, but the jewel case is for 2 CDs?). Was there ever a 2CD version of KTF? Are there any noteworthy, particularly worthwhile releases? With SWW and NJ it's obvious that they got enhanced rereleases with bonus stuff, but I don't know about KTF |
Quote:
Just looking at the versions available on Discogs there were 2CD releases in Europe, Canada and Japan that had 7 (Japan) or 8 (Europe & Canada) live tracks on the second CD in 1993. Spain even got a 3CD version with 4 acoustic tracks on the third CD. Japan got another 2CD version in 1998 featuring live tracks, the bonus tracks (so Save A Prayer and Starting All Over Again) and Cama De Rosas on the second CD. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
In my opinion it's Probably one of the better songs of the THINFS album and also the live performance was very enjoyable. I can't understand why they played it only a couple of times live... What do you think about the live version of Born Again Tomorrow? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Aloha !
Quote:
Salaam Aleikum, Sebastiaan |
Always is a really tough song to sing..
On another note i still have hope we ll eventually get a couple of unreleased pro shots remastered live videos from the 90s |
Picking up on that. There's a misconception that Jon's voice was always good in the 90's. It was actually a lot of up and down. Sure, even the bad nights were on a pretty solid level. But 1993 had a lot of fluctuations, he was struggling at the start of the tour (listen to things like East Rutherford or Ottawa early on), then ramped up near the end of the first US leg, carried it through Europe to Japan and then had to go more into "preservation mode" for the second half of the year (meaning that the voice was still there, but he used much less rasp, dodged some demanding lines and started switching songs like In These Arms or Dry County in and out).
Going into 1995, it was a good level throughout, but really ramped up from the summer tour onwards to the year's final in South Africa. London was great, Always spot on, but what "killed" him there was them playing three 150/160 min shows on three consecutive nights. Night 2 was stellar and far better than round 1 and 3. Lord knows why they chose to record on Sunday instead of Saturday, given their own experience from past tours. From the encore onwards, his voice fell flat in comparison to the standards back then. There's a reason why the second half of the show was only put on the video with Hey God, Wanted and TAALS (all of them had overdubbed vocal lines in there). In Bed Of Roses, Richie almost doubled him on the entire song and These Days was really disappointing. If you listen to the unaltered show from the radio broadcast, you notice it much more: Always was absolutely great, no doubt! But the performances from Night 2 in London and Jones Beach or from Burgettstown and Milwaukee might just have edged it out for me. In fact, during all their 4 big albums, the most stable his voice was for a consecutive period was 1989 :D |
Such great information and really useful getting the full picture. I remember listening to the live radio broadcast at the time (still have it) and was just so happy with the sound quality...alot of that was the whole sound with me as much as Jon's singing but I remember the first half much more and never realised he tailed off as it went on or even damaged his voice specifically. And I thought the official b-sides of it were about the best the band could be.
I've got a pleasing smile about the 1989 comment. I'm kind of obsessed with the New Jersey tour performances (I joined the forum about the live versions and the cancelled live album). Even now, I'm loving the obi 1989 and wembley arena 1988 performances on the archive and am improving my collection all the time! He does sound good, but always thought he got better 93-96! Maybe he didn't and was never 100% consistent any period. |
Jon and Brett Michael's at a race track this weekend.
Would love a Jovi / Poison tourhttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...bd480de951.jpg Sent from my SM-S926B using Tapatalk |
About one song that I love… Mystery Train
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ-YPr...eSB0cmFpbiA%3D At the minute 3:43 It was an error in the final mix when the song it was made that seems almost a hiccup by Jon? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
And the breath intakes on Just Older are much worse[emoji23]
Gesendet von meinem X30 mit Tapatalk |
I think I've asked this brefore but can't find the links, does anyone have the video of Phil recording the Walls solo / Shanks and Phil recording the backing vocals?
|
Quote:
I just found this... https://www.facebook.com/PhilXFanClu...2462893815571/ |
Interesting. Jon seems happy to air the dirty laundry....
https://youtu.be/itzP9I7k6lM?si=irfuVTnFxQFS_bqT |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.