jessycardy |
06-12-2013 01:08 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayster
(Post 1137963)
Don't you think though that the longer he is away, the less likely it is he'll be back?
|
It depends on what you mean. When you really stop and think about it for a moment, it's totally irrational and stupid to believe that Richie might be back for any of the European dates. Like, seriously. And I think Matt and company know this very well and are just looking for the attention or something. I don't know what their motives are, but it's clear that he won't be back for Europe. Sometimes statements from Jon's interviews pop up in my head and I'm like what are we even talking about here? We keep saying that we know nothing, and it's true. But at the same time, Jon told us a lot, almost everything. I know it doesn't make sense logically, but that's the situation. When you have Jon dropping the "if at all" bomb, for instance, it's healthier for everybody waiting for their show in Europe to just sit back and admit it: he won't be at our shows. There, if I did it, you can too.
Now, back to your question. It was officially announced that Richie will be absent from the rest of the European leg. Before that, the same was done for the previous leg. It's quite obvious that, WHATEVER the issue is, like, literally, WHATEVER, Richie won't be back in the middle of a tour leg. It's just not gonna happen! So, rather than "the longer he is away", I would say "the more legs of the tour he's missing". As much as it's more and more frustrating for us with each day passing by without any new info, the truth is the situation could have changed on the first date of the European leg. It didn't, and it won't until the very end of it. It's hard, but we probably won't have a clue more than we do now until July 12th... Which, by the way, is the day after his birthday. Theories and conspiracies and rambles are welcome.
|